PhysicalEye-Decide-35B
👁
32
One-pass calibrated decisions on images
QuantID PRO
quantid
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
liked a Space about 15 hours ago
masterset-ai/PhysicalEye-Decide-35B-demo liked a dataset about 15 hours ago
FINAL-Bench/oqc-data liked a Space about 15 hours ago
FINAL-Bench/open-quantum-challengeOrganizations
None yet
liked a
Space about 15 hours ago
liked a
dataset about 15 hours ago
liked a
Space about 15 hours ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 🔥 about 15 hours ago
Post
1487
⚛️ The Open Quantum Challenge is live. Both seasons open today.
Quantum computers are expensive, queued, and reachable by only a few. So we removed the barrier. With a single GPU and a public harness, anyone can contribute to core quantum-computing problems with no quantum hardware at all. That is the point of this challenge: to move quantum research from a handful of labs to everyone.
• Season 1, Quantum simulation: reproduce a target quantum system on a GPU.
• Season 2, QEC decoder: correct errors on coded quantum states.
Answers are held privately and every submission is auto-scored against a frozen ground truth, so the ranking is reproducible and hardware-independent.
🏆 Prize: 2,000 USD total (1,000 USD per season, 🥇600 / 🥈300 / 🥉100)
Getting started takes one step: copy the participation guide from the Space and paste it into Codex or Claude Code, then submit against the harness.
📄 Read the article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/the-open-quantum-challenge-quantum-simulation-and
👉 Challenge: FINAL-Bench/open-quantum-challenge
Quantum computers are expensive, queued, and reachable by only a few. So we removed the barrier. With a single GPU and a public harness, anyone can contribute to core quantum-computing problems with no quantum hardware at all. That is the point of this challenge: to move quantum research from a handful of labs to everyone.
• Season 1, Quantum simulation: reproduce a target quantum system on a GPU.
• Season 2, QEC decoder: correct errors on coded quantum states.
Answers are held privately and every submission is auto-scored against a frozen ground truth, so the ranking is reproducible and hardware-independent.
🏆 Prize: 2,000 USD total (1,000 USD per season, 🥇600 / 🥈300 / 🥉100)
Getting started takes one step: copy the participation guide from the Space and paste it into Codex or Claude Code, then submit against the harness.
📄 Read the article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/the-open-quantum-challenge-quantum-simulation-and
👉 Challenge: FINAL-Bench/open-quantum-challenge
liked a
Space about 15 hours ago
updated a
Space about 18 hours ago
liked a
Space 2 days ago
upvoted an article 2 days ago
Article
Leading the System One Mosaic Benchmark: What Darwin-27B-ZTC-v2's #1 Means
FINAL-Bench
• • 6 reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 🔥 3 days ago
Post
4057
🏆 Darwin-27B-ZTC-v2 just took #1 on the System One Mosaic Benchmark (S1MB).
S1MB compares 102 models across 137 specialized benchmarks, in three task types: Noul (assess a condition), Choice (select an option), Score (rate on a scale). Ranking is by overall Borda score.
📊 Top of the board
🥇 Darwin ZTC v2 (FINAL-Bench) 89.58
🥈 OpenJev-27B 87.50
🥉 AutoJev-27B 87.07
4️⃣ Eikos 27B 85.43
5️⃣ Jev 1.13 85.05
🔎 Ranks 2 to 5 are all the JEV family (TypeSafe AI's System One model, from ex-OpenAI researchers). S1MB exists to compare these System One judges, so leading it is the headline.
⚙️ Why a zero-token judge wins here
🔹 It does not generate. It reads the input and typed questions and returns a calibrated distribution in a single forward pass.
🔹 Zero generated tokens, no decoding loop, so latency and cost stay low.
🔹 Holds up out of distribution too: General Noul 96.00, General Choice 99.34.
It is also #1 on the typed-decisions leaderboard (0.743, zero-shot). Same message from both: a deterministic, calibrated judge at one forward pass per call.
🔗 Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-27B-ZTC-v2
🔗 Leaderboard: hotchpotch/S1MB-leaderboard
Standings move as new models are added. Numbers reflect the board at the time of writing. 🙌
S1MB compares 102 models across 137 specialized benchmarks, in three task types: Noul (assess a condition), Choice (select an option), Score (rate on a scale). Ranking is by overall Borda score.
📊 Top of the board
🥇 Darwin ZTC v2 (FINAL-Bench) 89.58
🥈 OpenJev-27B 87.50
🥉 AutoJev-27B 87.07
4️⃣ Eikos 27B 85.43
5️⃣ Jev 1.13 85.05
🔎 Ranks 2 to 5 are all the JEV family (TypeSafe AI's System One model, from ex-OpenAI researchers). S1MB exists to compare these System One judges, so leading it is the headline.
⚙️ Why a zero-token judge wins here
🔹 It does not generate. It reads the input and typed questions and returns a calibrated distribution in a single forward pass.
🔹 Zero generated tokens, no decoding loop, so latency and cost stay low.
🔹 Holds up out of distribution too: General Noul 96.00, General Choice 99.34.
It is also #1 on the typed-decisions leaderboard (0.743, zero-shot). Same message from both: a deterministic, calibrated judge at one forward pass per call.
🔗 Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-27B-ZTC-v2
🔗 Leaderboard: hotchpotch/S1MB-leaderboard
Standings move as new models are added. Numbers reflect the board at the time of writing. 🙌
liked a
model 3 days ago
liked a
Space 3 days ago
liked 9
datasets 4 days ago
Delores-Lin/MDPBench
Benchmark • Updated • 1.54k • 48
joelniklaus/LEXam-hard
Benchmark • Updated • 518 • 867 • 24
LiquidAI/ifstruct-v1.0
Benchmark • Updated • 2k • 623 • 103
MathArena/aime_2026
Benchmark • Updated • 30 • 31.3k • 86
MathArena/hmmt_feb_2026
Benchmark • Updated • 33 • 18.3k • 31
LEXam-Benchmark/LEXam
Benchmark • Updated • 7.54k • 1.76k • 71
llamaindex/ExtractBench
Benchmark • Updated • 370 • 15.6k • 58
MMMU/MMMU_Pro
Benchmark • Updated • 5.19k • 19.2k • 91
LocalLLaMA/typed-decisions
Benchmark • Updated • 3.2k • 38.5k • 163