kanaria007/agi-structural-intelligence-protocols
Updated
•
626
•
7
kanaria007 PRO
kanaria007
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
posted
an
update
about 7 hours ago
✅ New Article: *Governing Self-Modification*
Title:
🧭 Governing Self-Modification - A Charter for the Pattern-Learning Bridge
🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/governing-self-modification
---
Summary:
“Let the system patch itself” sounds futuristic. In practice, it’s pattern mining over incidents + patch proposals + gradual drift risk.
This draft is a *non-normative charter* for governing a Pattern-Learning Bridge (PLB): a subsystem that proposes (and sometimes applies) changes to policies, thresholds, and even code.
> If you’re going to let a system help rewrite itself,
> this is the minimum structure you owe yourself.
---
Why It Matters:
• Prevents *slow, invisible goal drift* from “many tiny good patches”
• Blocks *governance bypass* (no self-budget edits, no weakening core constraints)
• Makes change *measurable* (meta-metrics like adoption rate, rollback rate, sandbox↔prod agreement)
• Defines an *emergency stop* and “rollback the PLB window” capability
---
What’s Inside:
• A practical threat model for self-modification (overfitting, drift, bypass, over-trust)
• *Self-mod budgets*: scope × magnitude × rate, with zone ladders (auto-patch → human-gated → suggest-only)
• A full governance pipeline: sensing → mining → proposal → validation → decision → deploy → retrospective
• Non-negotiable *red lines* + adversarial patch detection patterns
• Adoption roadmap: advisor → low-risk auto-patch → co-pilot → multi-agent → constitutional diagnostic
---
📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series
A governance note for the moment “learning” starts touching the system itself.
published
an
article
about 7 hours ago
Governing Self-Modification - A Charter for the Pattern-Learning Bridge
posted
an
update
1 day ago
✅ New Article: *Digital Constitution for SI Networks*
Title:
🏛️ Digital Constitution for SI Networks - Auditable Law Above Many SI-Cores
🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/digital-constitution-for-si
---
*Summary:*
Single-system “AI ethics” doesn’t scale. Real deployments become *networks*: many independent SI-Core instances, across orgs and jurisdictions, sharing data and making effectful decisions in the same world.
This article proposes a *digital constitution layer*: a versioned, hash-chained set of *non-negotiable norms* and *minimum rights*, enforced *structurally* inside runtime gates — not as a PDF that nobody can verify.
> A constitution isn’t a document.
> *It’s an enforceable floor — with proofs.*
---
*Why It Matters:*
• Moves from “Is this system ethical?” → “What rules bind the whole network?”
• Defines *hard red lines* (prohibited actions) + *soft obligations* (logging, review, transparency)
• Makes compliance *auditable and replayable* (which constitution version applied, which norm fired, why)
• Provides a realistic path for *multi-jurisdiction conflict handling* and constitutional amendments
---
*What’s Inside:*
• Three-layer model: local policy → org/sector charters → *network-level constitution*
• Constitutional objects: versioned constitution IDs, scope tags, compiled norms
• Runtime behavior: hard-stops, obligations, evidence trails, and “no external effect” guarantees
• Amendment lifecycle: shadow-mode simulation → ratification → staged rollout → historical replay
• What regulators actually see: status pages, norm-sliced metrics, incident reports, cross-border traces
---
📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series
If SI is going to operate across cities, hospitals, grids, and nations, then governance must be *structural, measurable, and enforceable* — not rhetorical.
Organizations
None yet