version stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis stringlengths 10 229 | hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 39 | facts stringlengths 0 3.08k | facts_formula stringlengths 0 908 | proofs listlengths 0 1 | proofs_formula listlengths 0 1 | negative_hypothesis stringlengths 10 203 ⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 37 ⌀ | negative_proofs listlengths 0 1 | negative_original_tree_depth int64 0 27 ⌀ | original_tree_depth int64 1 3 | depth int64 0 3 ⌀ | num_formula_distractors int64 0 22 | num_translation_distractors int64 0 0 | num_all_distractors int64 0 22 | proof_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial stringlengths 76 3.25k | proof_serial stringlengths 11 798 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.3 | That rotenone is a morgen. | {C}{a} | fact1: That rotenone is both not a discredit and not a spume. fact2: Something is not a morgen if the thing is not a discredit. fact3: The ligule is not a kind of a morgen. fact4: That rotenone is not a spume. | fact1: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}x fact3: ¬{C}{il} fact4: ¬{B}{a} | [
"fact1 -> int1: That rotenone is not a discredit.; fact2 -> int2: That rotenone is not a morgen if that rotenone is not a discredit.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; fact2 -> int2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That rotenone is both not a discredit and not a spume. fact2: Something is not a morgen if the thing is not a discredit. fact3: The ligule is not a kind of a morgen. fact4: That rotenone is not a spume. ; $hypothesis$ = That rotenone is a morgen. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> int1: That rotenone is not a discredit.; fact2 -> int2: That rotenone is not a morgen if that rotenone is not a discredit.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This albiticness does not happens. | ¬{D} | fact1: That autobiographicness occurs. fact2: If this wheedling happens but the mystifying Josephus does not happens that radiance does not happens. fact3: That that publishing Jerez does not happens is prevented by that the pastoral occurs. fact4: That that descaling Violaceae occurs or that this grasping does not occ... | fact1: {A} fact2: ({P} & ¬{O}) -> ¬{N} fact3: {DF} -> {L} fact4: ({G} v ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact5: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ¬{N} -> (¬{L} & ¬{M}) fact7: {A} -> {B} fact8: {IF} -> {CB} fact9: ¬{E} -> ({D} v {C}) fact10: ¬({F} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{F} fact11: ¬({I} v ¬{H}) -> ¬{G} fact12: ¬{L} -> ({K} & {J}) fact13: ¬{G} -> ¬(¬{F}... | [
"fact7 & fact1 -> int1: The fact that this nailing happens hold.;"
] | [
"fact7 & fact1 -> int1: {B};"
] | This albiticness does not happens. | ¬{D} | [] | 12 | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That autobiographicness occurs. fact2: If this wheedling happens but the mystifying Josephus does not happens that radiance does not happens. fact3: That that publishing Jerez does not happens is prevented by that the pastoral occurs. fact4: That that descaling Violaceae occurs or that this grasping do... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | There is some person such that if it is not a rape and it is a alkaluria it is not proud. | (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | fact1: There exists something such that if that thing is not unemployed and that thing admonishes drib that thing is not benthonic. fact2: Some person is not multilane if the person is not Calvinistical and the person is a Plantaginaceae. fact3: If this willet is a basketful and it is a jape it is not a rape. fact4: Th... | fact1: (Ex): (¬{BU}x & {GK}x) -> ¬{E}x fact2: (x): (¬{BJ}x & {IT}x) -> ¬{FI}x fact3: ({GC}{aa} & {BD}{aa}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact4: (Ex): (¬{ER}x & {AN}x) -> ¬{BU}x fact5: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact6: (Ex): (¬{GF}x & {CE}x) -> {BO}x fact7: (Ex): (¬{CJ}x & {GR}x) -> {CB}x fact8: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}... | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | There exists some person such that if it is not Calvinistical and is a Plantaginaceae it is not multilane. | (Ex): (¬{BJ}x & {IT}x) -> ¬{FI}x | [
"fact19 -> int1: This somatotropin is not multilane if this somatotropin is not Calvinistical but that person is a Plantaginaceae.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: There exists something such that if that thing is not unemployed and that thing admonishes drib that thing is not benthonic. fact2: Some person is not multilane if the person is not Calvinistical and the person is a Plantaginaceae. fact3: If this willet is a basketful and it is a jape it is not a rape.... | fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That C2H6 haggles changed and is a conjecture. | ({A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) | fact1: That C2H6 is a kind of a sapidity if this Liverpudlian does not misplay handy or is not a sapidity or both. fact2: If somebody is a kind of a sapidity then the fact that she/he is a conjecture hold. fact3: If this pulassan does not strap Nautilidae then the thing does not polish Ms and is not a kind of a forlorn... | fact1: (¬{F}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) -> {D}{aa} fact2: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact3: ¬{J}{b} -> (¬{H}{b} & ¬{I}{b}) fact4: (¬{F}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) fact5: ¬{H}{c} fact6: ({F}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact8: ¬{J}{c} -> ¬(¬{I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) fact9: (¬{E}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact10: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) fact11: {G}... | [
"fact10 -> int1: That C2H6 does haggle changed and is a aquaphobia.; int1 -> int2: That C2H6 haggles changed.; fact2 -> int3: If the fact that that C2H6 is a kind of a sapidity is correct that C2H6 is a conjecture.; fact4 & fact1 -> int4: That C2H6 is a sapidity.; int3 & int4 -> int5: That that C2H6 is a conjecture... | [
"fact10 -> int1: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}); int1 -> int2: {A}{aa}; fact2 -> int3: {D}{aa} -> {C}{aa}; fact4 & fact1 -> int4: {D}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> int5: {C}{aa}; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that C2H6 haggles changed and is a conjecture is wrong. | ¬({A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) | [
"fact25 & fact26 -> int6: That that bud does misplay handy but it is not a kind of a jerk is false.; int6 -> int7: There is something such that the fact that that thing misplays handy and is not a jerk does not hold.;"
] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That C2H6 is a kind of a sapidity if this Liverpudlian does not misplay handy or is not a sapidity or both. fact2: If somebody is a kind of a sapidity then the fact that she/he is a conjecture hold. fact3: If this pulassan does not strap Nautilidae then the thing does not polish Ms and is not a kind of... | fact10 -> int1: That C2H6 does haggle changed and is a aquaphobia.; int1 -> int2: That C2H6 haggles changed.; fact2 -> int3: If the fact that that C2H6 is a kind of a sapidity is correct that C2H6 is a conjecture.; fact4 & fact1 -> int4: That C2H6 is a sapidity.; int3 & int4 -> int5: That that C2H6 is a conjecture hold... |
0.3 | That barbel is a kind of a Himalaya but it is not a leucocytosis. | ({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | fact1: This Tuareg does outface prepotency and does pump Flemish. fact2: That seer is a heartbreak but the one is not uncontested. fact3: If that barbel is a Ningal and not a clangour then that barbel is not a Himalaya. fact4: That barbel is a heartbreak but this thing does not sintered. fact5: this Herzberg does furni... | fact1: ({M}{f} & {N}{f}) fact2: ({E}{a} & ¬{EI}{a}) fact3: ({DN}{b} & ¬{DH}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact4: ({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact5: {AA}{aa} fact6: {ER}{b} fact7: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact8: ¬(¬{G}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> ¬{G}{a} fact9: ¬{D}{b} fact10: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) fact11: ¬{I}{d} -> ¬(¬{G}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) fact12: {A}{a} fa... | [
"fact7 & fact12 -> int1: That barbel is a Himalaya.;"
] | [
"fact7 & fact12 -> int1: {B}{b};"
] | That that barbel is a Himalaya but it is not a kind of a leucocytosis is incorrect. | ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | [
"fact28 -> int2: If that barbel furnishes Herzberg then that that barbel is a kind of a Himalaya but the person is not a kind of a leucocytosis does not hold.; fact27 -> int3: That barbel does not sintered if the fact that it does not bypass perkiness and is not a heartbreak does not hold.; fact25 -> int4: If this ... | 11 | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This Tuareg does outface prepotency and does pump Flemish. fact2: That seer is a heartbreak but the one is not uncontested. fact3: If that barbel is a Ningal and not a clangour then that barbel is not a Himalaya. fact4: That barbel is a heartbreak but this thing does not sintered. fact5: this Herzberg ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That toff is non-auroral. | ¬{B}{aa} | fact1: That toff is Machiavellian. fact2: That toff is a costochondritis if that enalapril is a costochondritis. fact3: That that toff is anthropogenetic and that thing is an exit does not hold. fact4: If that something is not anthropogenetic but it is an exit is not true it is auroral. fact5: That that toff is not ant... | fact1: {FF}{aa} fact2: {C}{a} -> {C}{aa} fact3: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact5: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact6: ¬(¬{EH}{ak} & {DC}{ak}) -> {A}{ak} fact7: ¬({EA}{aa} & {FD}{aa}) fact8: {AM}{eg} -> {AA}{eg} fact9: {AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact10: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x & {F}x) fact... | [
"fact4 -> int1: If that that toff is not anthropogenetic but she is an exit is incorrect she is auroral.; fact17 & fact5 -> int2: The fact that that toff is not anthropogenetic but an exit does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; fact17 & fact5 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That toff is non-auroral. | ¬{B}{aa} | [
"fact24 -> int3: If that toff locates or is a kind of a costochondritis or both then that toff is not auroral.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That toff is Machiavellian. fact2: That toff is a costochondritis if that enalapril is a costochondritis. fact3: That that toff is anthropogenetic and that thing is an exit does not hold. fact4: If that something is not anthropogenetic but it is an exit is not true it is auroral. fact5: That that toff ... | fact4 -> int1: If that that toff is not anthropogenetic but she is an exit is incorrect she is auroral.; fact17 & fact5 -> int2: The fact that that toff is not anthropogenetic but an exit does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That infecting Lammas but notthe maturing hogwash occurs. | ({AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: If that this trapshooting and this backpacking occurs does not hold then that this uncharacteristicness does not occurs hold. fact2: If the inopportuneness does not happens then that this trapshooting occurs and this backpacking occurs is incorrect. fact3: This innateness but notthat Bogartianness occurs if this... | fact1: ¬({I} & {J}) -> ¬{H} fact2: ¬{K} -> ¬({I} & {J}) fact3: ¬{H} -> ({F} & ¬{G}) fact4: ¬{M} -> (¬{K} & ¬{L}) fact5: {B} -> ¬{AB} fact6: {F} -> ¬{D} fact7: {B} -> ¬{A} fact8: (¬{N} & ¬{O}) -> ¬{M} fact9: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C}) fact10: ¬{A} -> ¬({E} & ¬{DT}) fact11: {A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) | [] | [] | That infecting Lammas but notthe maturing hogwash occurs. | ({AA} & ¬{AB}) | [] | 5 | 1 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that this trapshooting and this backpacking occurs does not hold then that this uncharacteristicness does not occurs hold. fact2: If the inopportuneness does not happens then that this trapshooting occurs and this backpacking occurs is incorrect. fact3: This innateness but notthat Bogartianness occu... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | There exists some man such that it is a Melbourne. | (Ex): {A}x | fact1: There exists something such that it is a rupturewort. fact2: If the fact that something dungs and it does scar Puccinia does not hold it does not panel. fact3: There exists some person such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Palmales does not hold. fact4: There is something such that it is a Bidens. fact5:... | fact1: (Ex): {AS}x fact2: (x): ¬({D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: (Ex): {Q}x fact4: (Ex): {GL}x fact5: (Ex): {ED}x fact6: (Ex): {A}x fact7: (Ex): {IJ}x fact8: ¬{B}{b} -> ({FT}{a} & {A}{a}) fact9: (Ex): {DU}x fact10: (Ex): {IF}x fact11: (Ex): {BE}x | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | There exists something such that that does verbalize Duluth. | (Ex): {FT}x | [
"fact12 -> int1: If that this nominator dungs and does scar Puccinia is wrong then this nominator does not panel.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: There exists something such that it is a rupturewort. fact2: If the fact that something dungs and it does scar Puccinia does not hold it does not panel. fact3: There exists some person such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Palmales does not hold. fact4: There is something such that it is a Bide... | fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That cyclonalness happens. | {D} | fact1: If this housing occurs then that burning parsec happens. fact2: That burning parsec happens if this bunce happens. fact3: That cyclonalness does not occurs if this footnoting powered and that burning parsec occurs. fact4: That cyclonalness and this expecting Triglidae occurs if this footnoting powered does not o... | fact1: {E} -> {C} fact2: {F} -> {C} fact3: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact4: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact5: ({E} v {F}) | [
"fact5 & fact1 & fact2 -> int1: That burning parsec happens.;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact1 & fact2 -> int1: {C};"
] | That cyclonalness happens. | {D} | [] | 6 | 3 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If this housing occurs then that burning parsec happens. fact2: That burning parsec happens if this bunce happens. fact3: That cyclonalness does not occurs if this footnoting powered and that burning parsec occurs. fact4: That cyclonalness and this expecting Triglidae occurs if this footnoting powered ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This caoutchouc is non-potent and/or is not a kind of an informatics. | (¬{E}{d} v ¬{C}{d}) | fact1: If something stinks then it is not glycogenic. fact2: If that trunks is a orientalism then that fuzz is not urban. fact3: The fact that this caoutchouc is not potent or not an informatics or both if that fender is not a kind of an informatics is correct. fact4: That fender is not an informatics if that trunks is... | fact1: (x): {L}x -> ¬{J}x fact2: {A}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact3: ¬{C}{c} -> (¬{E}{d} v ¬{C}{d}) fact4: {B}{b} -> ¬{C}{c} fact5: (x): {O}x -> {N}x fact6: ¬{H}{e} -> ({I}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) fact7: (¬{E}{d} v {C}{d}) fact8: (x): {N}x -> ({L}{f} & {M}{f}) fact9: ¬{R}{g} fact10: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact11: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{E... | [
"fact14 & fact20 -> int1: That trunks is urban.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: That fender is not an informatics.; int2 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 & fact20 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & fact4 -> int2: ¬{C}{c}; int2 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this caoutchouc is either not potent or not an informatics or both is wrong. | ¬(¬{E}{d} v ¬{C}{d}) | [
"fact27 -> int3: That this caoutchouc is not potent or he/she is not an informatics or both is false if he/she is a orientalism.; fact24 -> int4: That that trunks is not a Photinia but it is psychotherapeutic is incorrect if that it is not a kind of a conservative is correct.; fact35 -> int5: If Humberto is not gly... | 18 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If something stinks then it is not glycogenic. fact2: If that trunks is a orientalism then that fuzz is not urban. fact3: The fact that this caoutchouc is not potent or not an informatics or both if that fender is not a kind of an informatics is correct. fact4: That fender is not an informatics if that... | fact14 & fact20 -> int1: That trunks is urban.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: That fender is not an informatics.; int2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That ornithischian grazes stranded. | {C}{b} | fact1: That index is a kind of a Dreissena and it misses Petaurista. fact2: That that index does not graze stranded is right if that ornithischian is a kind of a buccaneer. fact3: That ornithischian is a miserliness and that thing is a kind of a nominalism. fact4: That ornithischian does not miss Petaurista. fact5: If ... | fact1: ({E}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: {A}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} fact3: ({FC}{b} & {DI}{b}) fact4: ¬{B}{b} fact5: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact6: {B}{a} fact7: {F}{a} -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact8: {A}{gp} fact9: (x): (¬{E}x & {F}x) -> {E}{c} fact10: {E}{c} -> {D}{a} fact11: (x): ¬({H}x & {K}x) -> ¬{H}x fact12: ¬{G}{d} -> (¬{E}{d} & {F}{d}) ... | [
"fact15 -> int1: That index is a kind of a buccaneer.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact15 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | That index is a kind of a mishmash that grazes stranded. | ({AE}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"fact22 -> int2: That index misses Petaurista.; fact24 -> int3: If the fact that that index webs latter and does not graze stranded is incorrect that index graze stranded.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That index is a kind of a Dreissena and it misses Petaurista. fact2: That that index does not graze stranded is right if that ornithischian is a kind of a buccaneer. fact3: That ornithischian is a miserliness and that thing is a kind of a nominalism. fact4: That ornithischian does not miss Petaurista. ... | fact15 -> int1: That index is a kind of a buccaneer.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that that extrasystole does not happens and that elbowing does not happens is incorrect. | ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: That amylolyticness and the Scrabble occurs. fact2: That amylolyticness does not occurs if the fact that that extrasystole does not occurs and that elbowing does not happens is wrong. | fact1: ({B} & {A}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that extrasystole does not happens and that elbowing does not happens is incorrect.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That amylolyticness does not occurs.; fact1 -> int2: That amylolyticness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); fact2 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; fact1 -> int2: {B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That amylolyticness and the Scrabble occurs. fact2: That amylolyticness does not occurs if the fact that that extrasystole does not occurs and that elbowing does not happens is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that that extrasystole does not happens and that elbowing does not happens is incorr... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that extrasystole does not happens and that elbowing does not happens is incorrect.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That amylolyticness does not occurs.; fact1 -> int2: That amylolyticness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED... |
0.3 | This sterol does not revert. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: This sterol does not champion anabiosis. fact2: If Kassandra is not non-aromatic but this thing does not heap then this thing is a kind of a filariasis. fact3: If this sterol is a ArtsD and champions anabiosis this sterol is not non-aromatic. fact4: This sterol eases if the fact that this sterol does not eases a... | fact1: ¬{AB}{a} fact2: ({B}{bi} & ¬{G}{bi}) -> {DU}{bi} fact3: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact4: ¬(¬{E}{a} & {G}{a}) -> {E}{a} fact5: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: ({DR}{jd} & ¬{FF}{jd}) fact7: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) fact8: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{ej} & ¬{C}{ej}) fact9: (x): {D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact10: (x): {B}x ->... | [
"fact23 & fact5 -> int1: That this sterol is aromatic hold.; fact10 -> int2: This sterol reverts if this sterol is aromatic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact23 & fact5 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact10 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This sterol does not revert. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact24 -> int3: The fact that that this sterol does slacken but this one is not aromatic is wrong is right if this sterol is a kind of a O'Flaherty.; fact25 -> int4: This sterol is a O'Flaherty and it eases if it is not a Cynwulf.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This sterol does not champion anabiosis. fact2: If Kassandra is not non-aromatic but this thing does not heap then this thing is a kind of a filariasis. fact3: If this sterol is a ArtsD and champions anabiosis this sterol is not non-aromatic. fact4: This sterol eases if the fact that this sterol does n... | fact23 & fact5 -> int1: That this sterol is aromatic hold.; fact10 -> int2: This sterol reverts if this sterol is aromatic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | There is some person such that if the fact that it does not move Northumbria and is a rebroadcast is incorrect it is not a wrangling. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | fact1: There is some person such that if she is not a rebroadcast then she is not a wrangling. fact2: This heterograft is not most if this heterograft does not howl skittishness and is rich. fact3: There exists some man such that if the fact that that one is a kind of a Oxylebius that is humourous is false that one is ... | fact1: (Ex): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{B}x fact2: (¬{FU}{i} & {FT}{i}) -> ¬{DD}{i} fact3: (Ex): ¬({AT}x & {K}x) -> ¬{DL}x fact4: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact5: ¬{CQ}{aa} -> ¬{CL}{aa} fact6: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact7: (Ex): {CQ}x -> ¬{G}x fact8: (Ex): ¬(¬{AD}x & {H}x) -> ¬{GE}x fact9: (x): ¬(¬{CL}x & {J}x) ... | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | There exists someone such that if the fact that he does not tucker Kwajalein and he is a handbill is incorrect he is not acidic. | (Ex): ¬(¬{CL}x & {J}x) -> ¬{BK}x | [
"fact19 -> int1: The Seminole is not acidic if that that person does not tucker Kwajalein and is a handbill is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: There is some person such that if she is not a rebroadcast then she is not a wrangling. fact2: This heterograft is not most if this heterograft does not howl skittishness and is rich. fact3: There exists some man such that if the fact that that one is a kind of a Oxylebius that is humourous is false th... | fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That artichoke is astigmatic. | {D}{b} | fact1: If that torus is not cacogenic then the thing is not wholesome. fact2: That torus is a kind of a synopsis. fact3: The fact that if that something is both not non-astigmatic and not carbocyclic does not hold that thing is not non-astigmatic is true. fact4: Taylor is not non-astigmatic. fact5: If that torus is a k... | fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: {C}{a} fact3: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: {D}{ap} fact5: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact6: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}) | [] | [] | That artichoke is not wholesome. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"fact7 -> int1: If that that clingfish is astigmatic but this is not carbocyclic does not hold that clingfish is astigmatic.;"
] | 6 | 3 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that torus is not cacogenic then the thing is not wholesome. fact2: That torus is a kind of a synopsis. fact3: The fact that if that something is both not non-astigmatic and not carbocyclic does not hold that thing is not non-astigmatic is true. fact4: Taylor is not non-astigmatic. fact5: If that to... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This varlet is not tropical. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: This ramus is a festschrift. fact2: This ramus is an impact. fact3: If somebody is a festschrift then that person is not non-tropical. fact4: If this ramus is a festschrift this varlet is not an impact but it is a kind of a Lophiidae. fact5: Somebody that is not an impact and is a Lophiidae is not tropical. fact... | fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {AA}{a} fact3: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact4: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact5: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: ¬{AA}{b} fact7: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact8: ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} | [
"fact4 & fact1 -> int1: That this varlet is not an impact but a Lophiidae is true.; fact5 -> int2: If this varlet is not a kind of an impact and is a kind of a Lophiidae this varlet is not tropical.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); fact5 -> int2: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this varlet is tropical hold. | {B}{b} | [
"fact9 -> int3: If this varlet is a festschrift she/he is tropical.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This ramus is a festschrift. fact2: This ramus is an impact. fact3: If somebody is a festschrift then that person is not non-tropical. fact4: If this ramus is a festschrift this varlet is not an impact but it is a kind of a Lophiidae. fact5: Somebody that is not an impact and is a Lophiidae is not trop... | fact4 & fact1 -> int1: That this varlet is not an impact but a Lophiidae is true.; fact5 -> int2: If this varlet is not a kind of an impact and is a kind of a Lophiidae this varlet is not tropical.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That stare does not occurs. | ¬{B} | fact1: If the fact that the beaking Myxinoidei occurs is true the jointing Daboecia occurs. fact2: That the forecasting Bissau occurs is triggered by this intraspecificness. fact3: That this simplism does not happens and this halting happens prevents that stare. fact4: The slicing happens. fact5: This grooming prevents... | fact1: {CM} -> {GS} fact2: {FN} -> {DF} fact3: (¬{C} & {D}) -> ¬{B} fact4: {JK} fact5: {A} -> {B} fact6: {CH} -> {FD} fact7: {G} -> {CI} fact8: (¬{A} & {C}) -> ¬{B} fact9: {IC} | [] | [] | That comprising happens. | {DS} | [] | 6 | 1 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If the fact that the beaking Myxinoidei occurs is true the jointing Daboecia occurs. fact2: That the forecasting Bissau occurs is triggered by this intraspecificness. fact3: That this simplism does not happens and this halting happens prevents that stare. fact4: The slicing happens. fact5: This groomin... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Both this overture and that bowling occurs. | ({A} & {B}) | fact1: That that androgenicness does not occurs and that bowling does not occurs is brought about by that that backness does not happens. fact2: If that androgenicness does not occurs then the fact that this overture and that bowling happens does not hold. fact3: That bowling occurs. fact4: This overture occurs. fact5:... | fact1: ¬{D} -> (¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact2: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact3: {B} fact4: {A} fact5: (¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact6: {K} -> (¬{J} & {I}) fact7: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) fact8: {F} -> (¬{D} & {E}) fact9: (¬{J} & {I}) -> ¬{H} fact10: ¬{B} -> ({CE} & {A}) | [
"fact4 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that both this overture and that bowling happens is not right. | ¬({A} & {B}) | [] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that androgenicness does not occurs and that bowling does not occurs is brought about by that that backness does not happens. fact2: If that androgenicness does not occurs then the fact that this overture and that bowling happens does not hold. fact3: That bowling occurs. fact4: This overture occu... | fact4 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This soapbox is a kind of a pediculosis and is a numbering. | ({B}{a} & {AB}{a}) | fact1: The spleenwort is not branchiopodous. fact2: If this soapbox does not breed gallimaufry this soapbox is branchiopodous. fact3: That this soapbox alternates crabbed is correct. fact4: That intaglio is a kind of a pediculosis. fact5: This soapbox is a pediculosis if that intaglio is a pediculosis. fact6: This soap... | fact1: ¬{AA}{ct} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact3: {HR}{a} fact4: {B}{b} fact5: {B}{b} -> {B}{a} fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact7: {AA}{a} fact8: ¬{AC}{aa} fact9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact10: ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact6 & fact10 -> int1: This soapbox is branchiopodous and it is a kind of a numbering.; int1 -> int2: The fact that this soapbox is a numbering hold.; fact4 & fact5 -> int3: The fact that this soapbox is a pediculosis is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact10 -> int1: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: {AB}{a}; fact4 & fact5 -> int3: {B}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That search breeds gallimaufry. | {A}{dr} | [
"fact11 -> int4: If this soapbox is not epiphyseal it is a pediculosis and it is myalgic.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The spleenwort is not branchiopodous. fact2: If this soapbox does not breed gallimaufry this soapbox is branchiopodous. fact3: That this soapbox alternates crabbed is correct. fact4: That intaglio is a kind of a pediculosis. fact5: This soapbox is a pediculosis if that intaglio is a pediculosis. fact6:... | fact6 & fact10 -> int1: This soapbox is branchiopodous and it is a kind of a numbering.; int1 -> int2: The fact that this soapbox is a numbering hold.; fact4 & fact5 -> int3: The fact that this soapbox is a pediculosis is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This quadruplet is conditional. | {B}{b} | fact1: This dormitory is not a Scipio if this dormitory is non-parturient. fact2: This vanity flounces Ogcocephalidae but it is not parturient if this dormitory is not conditional. fact3: If something is not a proparoxytone then it is both a Anacardium and geodesical. fact4: This dormitory is not a kind of a Scipio and... | fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{a} fact2: ¬{B}{a} -> ({AB}{hc} & ¬{A}{hc}) fact3: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact5: ¬{AA}{a} fact6: (x): ({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact7: (Ex): ¬{AA}x fact8: (Ex): {AB}x fact9: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}{b} fact10: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) fact11: (x): {E}x -... | [] | [] | This vanity flounces Ogcocephalidae. | {AB}{hc} | [
"fact13 -> int1: If this dormitory is a microbiology that does not pomade Chartres then the fact that that person is not conditional is true.; fact14 -> int2: This dormitory is a microbiology and does not pomade Chartres if it is a Anacardium.; fact15 -> int3: This dormitory is a kind of a Anacardium and is geodesi... | 7 | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This dormitory is not a Scipio if this dormitory is non-parturient. fact2: This vanity flounces Ogcocephalidae but it is not parturient if this dormitory is not conditional. fact3: If something is not a proparoxytone then it is both a Anacardium and geodesical. fact4: This dormitory is not a kind of a ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This gynandromorph is both not a Engels and not nonterritorial. | (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: The fact that this gynandromorph is not a Engels and the thing is territorial is wrong. fact2: That this radiocarbon is not a medley but it shares Tallinn is not right. | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: ¬(¬{HU}{be} & {CE}{be}) | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this gynandromorph is not a Engels and the thing is territorial is wrong. fact2: That this radiocarbon is not a medley but it shares Tallinn is not right. ; $hypothesis$ = This gynandromorph is both not a Engels and not nonterritorial. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that ransacking happens and that cashiering powered happens is wrong. | ¬({C} & {B}) | fact1: The pleading and that cashiering powered occurs. fact2: That ransacking occurs. | fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: {C} | [
"fact1 -> int1: That cashiering powered occurs.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: The pleading and that cashiering powered occurs. fact2: That ransacking occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that ransacking happens and that cashiering powered happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> int1: That cashiering powered occurs.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That Paco is not nonsuppurative but reverent is false. | ¬({C}{a} & {A}{a}) | fact1: If the fact that the fact that Paco does not Centre and/or it is a kind of a scaliness hold is wrong then Paco is a rich. fact2: Paco is reverent if it is a kind of a rich. fact3: If Paco is thematic that Paco is not connubial but nonsuppurative is wrong. fact4: The fact that Paco does not Centre and/or is a kin... | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact2: {B}{a} -> {A}{a} fact3: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{E}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact4: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) fact6: {D}{a} fact7: (x): {GH}x -> ¬(¬{AB}x & ¬{HD}x) | [
"fact1 & fact4 -> int1: Paco is a rich.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: Paco is reverent.; fact6 & fact3 -> int3: That that Paco is not connubial and not suppurative hold is incorrect.;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact4 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & fact2 -> int2: {A}{a}; fact6 & fact3 -> int3: ¬(¬{E}{a} & ¬{C}{a});"
] | That the scholastic is not a kind of a scaliness and it does not hypnotize Cervantes does not hold if the scholastic is Boeotian. | {GH}{ci} -> ¬(¬{AB}{ci} & ¬{HD}{ci}) | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: If the fact that the fact that Paco does not Centre and/or it is a kind of a scaliness hold is wrong then Paco is a rich. fact2: Paco is reverent if it is a kind of a rich. fact3: If Paco is thematic that Paco is not connubial but nonsuppurative is wrong. fact4: The fact that Paco does not Centre and/o... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This enclosure does not occurs. | ¬{E} | fact1: If the representing occurs the constitutionalness happens. fact2: Either that finances occurs or that intervertebralness happens or both. fact3: The portfolio does not happens. fact4: Both the Venetianness and this seeming happens. fact5: That stainableness does not occurs. fact6: That integumentalness does not ... | fact1: {BA} -> {DB} fact2: ({A} v {B}) fact3: ¬{EB} fact4: ({DT} & {CN}) fact5: ¬{AM} fact6: ¬{F} fact7: ({G} & ¬{F}) fact8: ({CB} & ¬{BH}) fact9: ({BL} & ¬{BK}) -> {EO} fact10: ({C} & {D}) -> ¬{E} fact11: ¬({H} & {G}) -> ¬{G} fact12: {IB} -> {FE} fact13: ({G} & {F}) -> {D} fact14: {P} fact15: {CG} -> {DQ} fact16: ¬{I}... | [
"fact2 & fact23 & fact22 -> int1: That hormonalness happens.; fact19 & fact7 -> int2: This colourfulness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Both that hormonalness and this colourfulness occurs.; int3 & fact10 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact23 & fact22 -> int1: {C}; fact19 & fact7 -> int2: {D}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({C} & {D}); int3 & fact10 -> hypothesis;"
] | This enclosure happens. | {E} | [] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If the representing occurs the constitutionalness happens. fact2: Either that finances occurs or that intervertebralness happens or both. fact3: The portfolio does not happens. fact4: Both the Venetianness and this seeming happens. fact5: That stainableness does not occurs. fact6: That integumentalness... | fact2 & fact23 & fact22 -> int1: That hormonalness happens.; fact19 & fact7 -> int2: This colourfulness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Both that hormonalness and this colourfulness occurs.; int3 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That declarativeness and that ragging fivesome occurs. | ({C} & {A}) | fact1: If this picturing Dactylopterus occurs then the fact that this autarkicalness but notthat bargaining occurs is wrong. fact2: This picturing Dactylopterus happens and the symphonicness happens. fact3: That non-declarativeness is brought about by that that intruding lucubration does not happens but this unsurprise... | fact1: {P} -> ¬({N} & ¬{Q}) fact2: ({P} & {S}) fact3: (¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} fact4: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact5: ({AD} & {CE}) fact6: ¬{G} -> ({M} & {F}) fact7: {E} -> (¬{B} & {D}) fact8: {D} fact9: {J} -> (¬{D} & {E}) fact10: (¬{G} v {I}) -> ¬{G} fact11: {B} fact12: ({A} & {B}) fact13: ¬{N} -> ({L} & {H}) fact14: ¬(¬{A... | [
"fact12 -> int1: That ragging fivesome happens.;"
] | [
"fact12 -> int1: {A};"
] | The fact that that declarativeness occurs and that ragging fivesome happens does not hold. | ¬({C} & {A}) | [] | 10 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If this picturing Dactylopterus occurs then the fact that this autarkicalness but notthat bargaining occurs is wrong. fact2: This picturing Dactylopterus happens and the symphonicness happens. fact3: That non-declarativeness is brought about by that that intruding lucubration does not happens but this ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that this disillusioning lymphogranuloma does not happens and/or the carry occurs is wrong. | ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) | fact1: The fact that this disillusioning lymphogranuloma does not happens and/or the carry occurs is wrong. fact2: That this hoops does not happens and/or the celioscopy occurs is wrong if this imperviableness happens. | fact1: ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{N} v {IH}) | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this hoops does not occurs or the celioscopy occurs or both does not hold. | ¬(¬{N} v {IH}) | [] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this disillusioning lymphogranuloma does not happens and/or the carry occurs is wrong. fact2: That this hoops does not happens and/or the celioscopy occurs is wrong if this imperviableness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this disillusioning lymphogranuloma does not happens and/or ... | fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That this endoblast is oaten is not false. | {C}{a} | fact1: If that Cebuan is not a kind of a Prototheria then that that Cebuan is a Kalahari but this is not a Zaar is incorrect. fact2: If that that fogy is oaten and it is conciliatory is not right this endoblast is not oaten. fact3: Some man that is a zygotene is not non-oaten. fact4: If that something is not a Vireonid... | fact1: ¬{E}{d} -> ¬({F}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) fact2: ¬({C}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact3: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact4: (x): (¬{G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{E}x fact5: {A}{a} fact6: (x): {CQ}x -> {DF}x fact7: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) -> {D}{c} fact8: {I}{d} -> (¬{G}{d} & {H}{d}) fact9: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) fact10: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} | [
"fact10 & fact5 -> int1: This endoblast is a zygotene.; fact3 -> int2: That this endoblast is oaten if this endoblast is a zygotene hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact10 & fact5 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact3 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this endoblast is non-oaten hold. | ¬{C}{a} | [
"fact11 -> int3: That that that fogy is oaten thing that is conciliatory is right does not hold if that that thing is not a kind of a zygotene hold.; fact14 -> int4: If that Cebuan is not a Vireonidae but it is major it is not a Prototheria.;"
] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that Cebuan is not a kind of a Prototheria then that that Cebuan is a Kalahari but this is not a Zaar is incorrect. fact2: If that that fogy is oaten and it is conciliatory is not right this endoblast is not oaten. fact3: Some man that is a zygotene is not non-oaten. fact4: If that something is not ... | fact10 & fact5 -> int1: This endoblast is a zygotene.; fact3 -> int2: That this endoblast is oaten if this endoblast is a zygotene hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This rivet is not a glinting. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: This rivet is a lactating. fact2: The rhino does not transubstantiate Ochna. fact3: The chock is a glinting. fact4: That this rivet does upheave hold. fact5: The greenshank is non-evergreen thing that is squared. fact6: This rivet is not barometrical. fact7: Some man is a glinting if the person feeds posthitis. ... | fact1: {CO}{a} fact2: ¬{A}{q} fact3: {B}{cl} fact4: {EH}{a} fact5: (¬{N}{fb} & {IG}{fb}) fact6: ¬{BG}{a} fact7: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact8: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{D}x & {C}x) | [] | [] | That cover does transubstantiate Ochna. | {A}{es} | [
"fact10 -> int1: That cover is a glinting if that cover feeds posthitis.; fact9 -> int2: That cover does not fingerprint Bellingham and feeds posthitis if it is not a Maine.;"
] | 5 | 1 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This rivet is a lactating. fact2: The rhino does not transubstantiate Ochna. fact3: The chock is a glinting. fact4: That this rivet does upheave hold. fact5: The greenshank is non-evergreen thing that is squared. fact6: This rivet is not barometrical. fact7: Some man is a glinting if the person feeds p... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That maternalism and that whirlpooling happens. | ({B} & {C}) | fact1: That unwomanliness happens. fact2: That that unwomanliness occurs prevents that that whirlpooling does not happens. fact3: This hypophysectomizedness and that maternalism occurs. fact4: If this hypophysectomizedness does not occurs that that maternalism and that whirlpooling occurs is false. | fact1: {D} fact2: {D} -> {C} fact3: ({A} & {B}) fact4: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) | [
"fact3 -> int1: That maternalism happens.; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: That whirlpooling occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: {B}; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That both that maternalism and that whirlpooling occurs does not hold. | ¬({B} & {C}) | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That unwomanliness happens. fact2: That that unwomanliness occurs prevents that that whirlpooling does not happens. fact3: This hypophysectomizedness and that maternalism occurs. fact4: If this hypophysectomizedness does not occurs that that maternalism and that whirlpooling occurs is false. ; $hypothe... | fact3 -> int1: That maternalism happens.; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: That whirlpooling occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This tumbleweed does constrict Piperaceae. | {C}{a} | fact1: If some man does constrict Piperaceae that it is a kind of a Orthopristis is correct. fact2: This tumbleweed is not a Orthopristis and retorts if this preteenager is a know. fact3: If something is a kind of a bridal then it is renal. fact4: This Kaopectate is a kind of a Orthopristis. fact5: If something retorts... | fact1: (x): {C}x -> {A}x fact2: {D}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact3: (x): {BH}x -> {GN}x fact4: {A}{cj} fact5: (x): {B}x -> {J}x fact6: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact7: {B}{cp} fact8: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact9: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact10: {A}{a} | [
"fact8 & fact10 -> int1: This tumbleweed retorts.; fact6 -> int2: If this tumbleweed retorts then the fact that it constricts Piperaceae is correct.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 & fact10 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact6 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This tumbleweed does not constrict Piperaceae. | ¬{C}{a} | [
"fact12 -> int3: If this tumbleweed is not a kind of a Orthopristis and does retort that does not constrict Piperaceae.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If some man does constrict Piperaceae that it is a kind of a Orthopristis is correct. fact2: This tumbleweed is not a Orthopristis and retorts if this preteenager is a know. fact3: If something is a kind of a bridal then it is renal. fact4: This Kaopectate is a kind of a Orthopristis. fact5: If somethi... | fact8 & fact10 -> int1: This tumbleweed retorts.; fact6 -> int2: If this tumbleweed retorts then the fact that it constricts Piperaceae is correct.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That slumberer does not brine basis and is not a divided. | (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | fact1: If that defloration is not sentential and/or it is not a Sorensen that slumberer is a kind of a Sorensen. fact2: That that slumberer brines basis but that is not a divided is false if that cob does not brines basis. fact3: If that cob does not brine basis that the fact that that slumberer does not brine basis an... | fact1: (¬{G}{c} v ¬{B}{c}) -> {B}{b} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & {C}{b}) fact4: ¬({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact5: (¬{G}{c} v ¬{B}{c}) fact6: {E}{b} -> ¬{D}{b} fact7: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {C}{b}) fact8: ¬{IR}{a} fact9: ¬{C}{ca} fact10: {B}{a} fact11: {E}{b} fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | [] | [] | That slumberer does not brine basis and is not a divided. | (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | [
"fact16 & fact13 -> int1: That slumberer is a Sorensen.; fact15 & fact14 -> int2: That slumberer does not spoil.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That slumberer is a Sorensen that does not spoil.;"
] | 5 | 2 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that defloration is not sentential and/or it is not a Sorensen that slumberer is a kind of a Sorensen. fact2: That that slumberer brines basis but that is not a divided is false if that cob does not brines basis. fact3: If that cob does not brine basis that the fact that that slumberer does not brin... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that this smirker specifies and heals Bowie is wrong. | ¬({C}{c} & {D}{c}) | fact1: The hinderance is congressional person that trespasses advantage. fact2: This Inconel specifies and/or it is Michelangelesque. fact3: This smirker is Michelangelesque. fact4: This smirker impounds roomful and is chondritic. fact5: This smirker heals Bowie and it mythicises Leda. fact6: This Inconel specifies. fa... | fact1: ({DL}{hu} & {A}{hu}) fact2: ({C}{a} v {B}{a}) fact3: {B}{c} fact4: ({DQ}{c} & {IJ}{c}) fact5: ({D}{c} & {E}{c}) fact6: {C}{a} fact7: {HC}{a} fact8: {B}{cl} fact9: ({FE}{a} & {HE}{a}) fact10: {B}{a} -> {C}{c} fact11: {IO}{a} fact12: {D}{a} fact13: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact14: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} fact15: {B}{b} -> ¬{B}{... | [
"fact13 & fact14 & fact10 -> int1: This smirker specifies.; fact5 -> int2: This smirker heals Bowie.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact13 & fact14 & fact10 -> int1: {C}{c}; fact5 -> int2: {D}{c}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this smirker specifies and heals Bowie is wrong. | ¬({C}{c} & {D}{c}) | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The hinderance is congressional person that trespasses advantage. fact2: This Inconel specifies and/or it is Michelangelesque. fact3: This smirker is Michelangelesque. fact4: This smirker impounds roomful and is chondritic. fact5: This smirker heals Bowie and it mythicises Leda. fact6: This Inconel spe... | fact13 & fact14 & fact10 -> int1: This smirker specifies.; fact5 -> int2: This smirker heals Bowie.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This Protestant does not happens. | ¬{A} | fact1: Both this Protestant and that sustentation happens. fact2: If that this Protestant happens and that PINNING Aristophanes happens is incorrect then this Protestant does not occurs. fact3: If that that PINNING Aristophanes and this crushing cert happens is false then that PINNING Aristophanes does not happens. fac... | fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬({A} & {C}) -> ¬{A} fact3: ¬({C} & {E}) -> ¬{C} fact4: ({IE} & {AH}) fact5: ¬({B} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact6: {B} fact7: {BG} fact8: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {FO}) fact9: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) fact10: ¬({I} & {D}) -> ¬{D} fact11: ¬{E} -> ¬({B} & ¬{D}) fact12: (¬{E} v {G}) -> ¬{E} | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | This Jacksonian occurs and this soar happens. | ({FO} & {F}) | [] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Both this Protestant and that sustentation happens. fact2: If that this Protestant happens and that PINNING Aristophanes happens is incorrect then this Protestant does not occurs. fact3: If that that PINNING Aristophanes and this crushing cert happens is false then that PINNING Aristophanes does not ha... | fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This consumptive happens. | {D} | fact1: This snowshoe happens and this trilling occurs. fact2: That this consumptive and this nonoperationalness occurs is brought about by that this muttering does not occurs. fact3: This consumptive does not occurs if this muttering and this Californian occurs. fact4: Both this nonoperationalness and this muttering oc... | fact1: ({CJ} & {AS}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact3: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact4: ({A} & {B}) fact5: {E} -> {C} | [
"fact4 -> int1: The fact that this muttering occurs hold.;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: {B};"
] | This consumptive happens. | {D} | [] | 6 | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This snowshoe happens and this trilling occurs. fact2: That this consumptive and this nonoperationalness occurs is brought about by that this muttering does not occurs. fact3: This consumptive does not occurs if this muttering and this Californian occurs. fact4: Both this nonoperationalness and this mu... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This bandoleer does not actualize debugger. | ¬{D}{a} | fact1: This bandoleer is not non-pyknotic. fact2: If something that is a kind of a protoarchaeology is a covalency then it does not actualize debugger. fact3: Some man is non-dysphoric if he is transmontane and he is a covalency. fact4: Everyone is a covalency. fact5: If this bandoleer is pyknotic then this bandoleer i... | fact1: {A}{a} fact2: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}x fact3: (x): ({DA}x & {C}x) -> ¬{S}x fact4: (x): {C}x fact5: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact6: ({EJ}{hb} & {A}{hb}) fact7: {GP}{a} | [
"fact5 & fact1 -> int1: This bandoleer is a protoarchaeology.; fact4 -> int2: This bandoleer is a kind of a covalency.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This bandoleer is a protoarchaeology and is a covalency.; fact2 -> int4: This bandoleer does not actualize debugger if this bandoleer is a protoarchaeology and a covalency.; i... | [
"fact5 & fact1 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact4 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}); fact2 -> int4: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | If Christa is transmontane and it is a covalency Christa is not dysphoric. | ({DA}{ar} & {C}{ar}) -> ¬{S}{ar} | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: This bandoleer is not non-pyknotic. fact2: If something that is a kind of a protoarchaeology is a covalency then it does not actualize debugger. fact3: Some man is non-dysphoric if he is transmontane and he is a covalency. fact4: Everyone is a covalency. fact5: If this bandoleer is pyknotic then this b... | fact5 & fact1 -> int1: This bandoleer is a protoarchaeology.; fact4 -> int2: This bandoleer is a kind of a covalency.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This bandoleer is a protoarchaeology and is a covalency.; fact2 -> int4: This bandoleer does not actualize debugger if this bandoleer is a protoarchaeology and a covalency.; int3 &... |
0.3 | This tollon is not a Seanad and it does not disobey brandish. | (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: That amberfish facsimiles correctness. fact2: The fact that this tollon is not a Seanad but it does disobey brandish is wrong. fact3: This tollon is agrobiological. fact4: That earner is not a kind of a Seanad. fact5: This tollon does not disobey brandish. fact6: If that this tollon does not urge Stravinsky and ... | fact1: {A}{b} fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: {EL}{a} fact4: ¬{AA}{gc} fact5: ¬{AB}{a} fact6: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{b} fact7: {AE}{ac} fact8: ¬{JD}{b} fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact10: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact11: {A}{b} -> {B}{b} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this tollon is not a Seanad and does not disobey brandish does not hold.; fact1 & fact11 -> int1: That amberfish does urge Stravinsky.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); fact1 & fact11 -> int1: {B}{b};"
] | Let's assume that that this tollon is not a Seanad and does not disobey brandish does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact12 -> int2: If that amberfish does not facsimile correctness then the fact that that amberfish is not a kind of a Seanad and this person does not disobey brandish is false.;"
] | 5 | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That amberfish facsimiles correctness. fact2: The fact that this tollon is not a Seanad but it does disobey brandish is wrong. fact3: This tollon is agrobiological. fact4: That earner is not a kind of a Seanad. fact5: This tollon does not disobey brandish. fact6: If that this tollon does not urge Strav... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Either that impressionist does not happens or that ballet occurs or both. | (¬{AA} v {AB}) | fact1: If this Hippocraticness does not occurs then the fact that that impressionist does not occurs or that ballet happens or both is false. fact2: If this Hippocraticness does not happens then that sulfuring pediatrics does not occurs and/or that gunfire occurs. fact3: The chairing occurs. fact4: That stiffening part... | fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) fact2: ¬{A} -> (¬{BS} v {CT}) fact3: {EF} fact4: ({L} v {FL}) fact5: ({JH} v {DB}) fact6: {Q} fact7: ({AA} v {AB}) fact8: {EP} -> ({EC} v {AJ}) fact9: {D} -> (¬{JA} v {AD}) fact10: {CK} -> ({HP} v {HF}) fact11: (¬{DG} v {EO}) fact12: {EU} fact13: {FF} -> ({EA} v {DN}) fact14: (¬{CR} v {EK... | [
"fact21 & fact19 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact21 & fact19 -> hypothesis;"
] | Either that sulfuring pediatrics does not happens or that gunfire occurs or both. | (¬{BS} v {CT}) | [] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If this Hippocraticness does not occurs then the fact that that impressionist does not occurs or that ballet happens or both is false. fact2: If this Hippocraticness does not happens then that sulfuring pediatrics does not occurs and/or that gunfire occurs. fact3: The chairing occurs. fact4: That stiff... | fact21 & fact19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that the fact that that everything rags oligodontia and it is not a kind of a verticil hold is true is incorrect. | ¬((x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | fact1: Everyone rags oligodontia and is not a verticil. | fact1: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: Everyone rags oligodontia and is not a verticil. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that the fact that that everything rags oligodontia and it is not a kind of a verticil hold is true is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That nitrosobacteria redresses Saba. | {B}{a} | fact1: Some man does not redress Saba if it is not a Sabine and it does not sink 1930s. fact2: This turbine does not redress Saba. fact3: That nitrosobacteria does resuscitate McAlester. fact4: If something is unlabeled this does not imbricated gaudery and is not acropetal. fact5: Something is a kind of a Sabine if it ... | fact1: (x): (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: ¬{B}{gg} fact3: {CA}{a} fact4: (x): {E}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{F}x) fact5: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact6: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({H}x & {I}x) fact7: (x): (¬{L}x v {K}x) fact8: (x): {H}x -> {G}x fact9: ¬{A}{a} fact10: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) fact11: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{AI}{a}) fact12: ¬(¬... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that nitrosobacteria does not redress Saba.; fact9 & assump1 -> int1: That nitrosobacteria does not sink 1930s and does not redress Saba.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{B}{a}; fact9 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a});"
] | Let's assume that that nitrosobacteria does not redress Saba. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"fact24 -> int2: That nitrosobacteria does not redress Saba if that nitrosobacteria is not a kind of a Sabine and does not sink 1930s.; fact20 -> int3: That nitrosobacteria is not a kind of a Sabine and does not sink 1930s if this one does not imbricated gaudery.; fact21 -> int4: If Grace is unlabeled it does not i... | 9 | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some man does not redress Saba if it is not a Sabine and it does not sink 1930s. fact2: This turbine does not redress Saba. fact3: That nitrosobacteria does resuscitate McAlester. fact4: If something is unlabeled this does not imbricated gaudery and is not acropetal. fact5: Something is a kind of a Sab... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This catamenia does not sweeten ngwee. | ¬{B}{c} | fact1: If that that reprinting overwhelms Myrmeleon and this person is a kind of a Rosicrucianism is not correct this argyle does not sweeten ngwee. fact2: This argyle overwhelms Myrmeleon. fact3: If that something is not a rent and not non-anthropic is incorrect the fact that the thing is not ruminant is correct. fact... | fact1: ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: {A}{a} fact3: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{B}{c} fact5: ¬{E}{fo} -> ¬({C}{fo} & {D}{fo}) fact6: (x): ¬({C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact7: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} fact8: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{CT}x & ¬{AA}x) fact9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact10: (x): ¬{... | [] | [] | The fact that that adoptee is not a sloped and not a Cercocebus is incorrect. | ¬(¬{CT}{fo} & ¬{AA}{fo}) | [
"fact16 -> int1: If that that adoptee does overwhelm Myrmeleon is correct that this thing is not a sloped and this thing is not a Cercocebus is incorrect.; fact17 -> int2: That adoptee overwhelms Myrmeleon and sweetens ngwee if that adoptee is not a Rosicrucianism.; fact14 -> int3: If the fact that that adoptee is ... | 7 | 2 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that that reprinting overwhelms Myrmeleon and this person is a kind of a Rosicrucianism is not correct this argyle does not sweeten ngwee. fact2: This argyle overwhelms Myrmeleon. fact3: If that something is not a rent and not non-anthropic is incorrect the fact that the thing is not ruminant is cor... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Edna is not Amharic. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: Edna is not Amharic if this thripid is not a waxed and is benignant. fact2: This thripid is not a kind of a Otaria. fact3: Something that is not a Appalachia is not a Otaria but Amharic. fact4: Something is not a waxed but it is benignant if it is not a kind of a Otaria. fact5: If that Edna is not a kind of a fa... | fact1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: ¬{A}{aa} fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact5: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact6: ¬{AA}{aa} fact7: ¬{AA}{en} fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) | [
"fact4 -> int1: This thripid is not a waxed and is benignant if this thripid is not a Otaria.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This thripid is not a waxed and is benignant.; int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 & fact2 -> int2: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | Edna is Amharic. | {B}{a} | [
"fact9 -> int3: Edna is a Otaria and Amharic if she is not a Appalachia.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Edna is not Amharic if this thripid is not a waxed and is benignant. fact2: This thripid is not a kind of a Otaria. fact3: Something that is not a Appalachia is not a Otaria but Amharic. fact4: Something is not a waxed but it is benignant if it is not a kind of a Otaria. fact5: If that Edna is not a ki... | fact4 -> int1: This thripid is not a waxed and is benignant if this thripid is not a Otaria.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This thripid is not a waxed and is benignant.; int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That everything is intestinal is false. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: If somebody is a kind of a veracity then that it is a Augeas is correct. fact2: If that something is a syllabus but this is not intestinal does not hold this is apneic. fact3: Everything is a Guantanamo. fact4: Every person is hypophyseal. fact5: Everything is intestinal. fact6: Every person blacklists. fact7: E... | fact1: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact2: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {AA}x fact3: (x): {BJ}x fact4: (x): {O}x fact5: (x): {A}x fact6: (x): {AR}x fact7: (x): {R}x fact8: (x): {DL}x fact9: (x): {C}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact10: (x): ({E}x & {F}x) fact11: (x): {AG}x fact12: (x): {AA}x fact13: (x): {F}x | [
"fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | Everything is apneic. | (x): {AA}x | [
"fact17 -> int1: If the fact that this cheesecake is a kind of a syllabus but the person is not intestinal does not hold the person is apneic.; fact16 -> int2: The fact that this cheesecake is both a syllabus and not intestinal is wrong if this cheesecake is a kind of a Augeas.; fact15 -> int3: This cheesecake is a... | 7 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If somebody is a kind of a veracity then that it is a Augeas is correct. fact2: If that something is a syllabus but this is not intestinal does not hold this is apneic. fact3: Everything is a Guantanamo. fact4: Every person is hypophyseal. fact5: Everything is intestinal. fact6: Every person blacklists... | fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That that yurt dumps Pauropoda is right. | {C}{a} | fact1: That yurt is aneuploid if it bestrides. fact2: That yurt bestrides. fact3: This totem is illegal if it grizzles Diceros. fact4: Someone dumps Pauropoda if it is aneuploid. | fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact2: {A}{a} fact3: {CA}{jg} -> {CC}{jg} fact4: (x): {B}x -> {C}x | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: That yurt is aneuploid.; fact4 -> int2: If that yurt is not non-aneuploid that yurt dumps Pauropoda.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact4 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That yurt is aneuploid if it bestrides. fact2: That yurt bestrides. fact3: This totem is illegal if it grizzles Diceros. fact4: Someone dumps Pauropoda if it is aneuploid. ; $hypothesis$ = That that yurt dumps Pauropoda is right. ; $proof$ = | fact1 & fact2 -> int1: That yurt is aneuploid.; fact4 -> int2: If that yurt is not non-aneuploid that yurt dumps Pauropoda.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This annexing does not occurs. | ¬{C} | fact1: This impress triggers that this outroaring cacodaemon does not happens and/or the non-poorness. fact2: That poorness or this outroaring cacodaemon or both happens. fact3: That the packaging does not occurs yields that this incompatibleness and the cruising happens. fact4: That this impress does not happens is pr... | fact1: {D} -> (¬{B} v ¬{A}) fact2: ({A} v {B}) fact3: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact4: {E} -> {D} fact5: {A} -> {C} | [] | [] | This annexing does not occurs. | ¬{C} | [] | 8 | 1 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This impress triggers that this outroaring cacodaemon does not happens and/or the non-poorness. fact2: That poorness or this outroaring cacodaemon or both happens. fact3: That the packaging does not occurs yields that this incompatibleness and the cruising happens. fact4: That this impress does not hap... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That shielding Phyllitis does not happens. | ¬{C} | fact1: That bodieding happens and this unifying occurs. fact2: That shielding Phyllitis occurs if that bodieding occurs. fact3: That that probing Ninurta occurs and that bodieding occurs is caused by that this unifying does not occurs. | fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: {A} -> {C} fact3: ¬{B} -> ({G} & {A}) | [
"fact1 -> int1: That bodieding occurs.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> int1: {A}; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That probing Ninurta occurs. | {G} | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That bodieding happens and this unifying occurs. fact2: That shielding Phyllitis occurs if that bodieding occurs. fact3: That that probing Ninurta occurs and that bodieding occurs is caused by that this unifying does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That shielding Phyllitis does not happens. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> int1: That bodieding occurs.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That screen is Kafkaesque. | {B}{a} | fact1: That screen swims predicator if that screen is both not an audible and transdermal. fact2: If that screen is not a temper and it is not a obstruent then it is Kafkaesque. fact3: Some man that is a avariciousness is not incompetent and is not a kind of a polygene. fact4: If that liparis is a milepost it is a avar... | fact1: (¬{EN}{a} & {DQ}{a}) -> {FJ}{a} fact2: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact3: (x): {D}x -> ({C}x & ¬{A}x) fact4: {E}{bg} -> {D}{bg} fact5: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: ({E}{bg} & {F}{bg}) fact7: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{P}{a}) -> {GK}{a} | [
"fact2 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | That liparis is a temper. | {AA}{bg} | [
"fact8 -> int1: If that liparis is a kind of a avariciousness the thing is both competent and not a polygene.; fact10 -> int2: That liparis is a milepost.; fact9 & int2 -> int3: That liparis is a avariciousness.; int1 & int3 -> int4: That liparis is not incompetent and is not a kind of a polygene.; int4 -> int5: Th... | 6 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That screen swims predicator if that screen is both not an audible and transdermal. fact2: If that screen is not a temper and it is not a obstruent then it is Kafkaesque. fact3: Some man that is a avariciousness is not incompetent and is not a kind of a polygene. fact4: If that liparis is a milepost it... | fact2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That rounding happens. | {A} | fact1: The fact that this dissension happens is correct. fact2: That both that non-Algerianness and this dorsiflexion occurs leads to that that viaticus does not happens. fact3: That noncrucialness occurs. fact4: That that viaticus occurs and that lightedness occurs brings about that that rounding does not occurs. fact... | fact1: {JI} fact2: (¬{E} & {F}) -> ¬{C} fact3: {G} fact4: ({C} & {B}) -> ¬{A} fact5: ¬({E} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{E} fact6: ¬(¬{D} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact7: {IP} fact8: ¬{B} -> ({HN} & {A}) fact9: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{D} & {B}) | [] | [] | That cheating Chester happens. | {HN} | [] | 9 | 1 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this dissension happens is correct. fact2: That both that non-Algerianness and this dorsiflexion occurs leads to that that viaticus does not happens. fact3: That noncrucialness occurs. fact4: That that viaticus occurs and that lightedness occurs brings about that that rounding does not oc... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That this prothrombinase is not a Chara but it is a kind of a DMD does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | fact1: If that this prothrombinase does jam Spilogale and is a Recife is incorrect that whisk is not a kind of a Recife. fact2: Somebody does rap Mankato and colourises noddle if she/he does not abbreviate. fact3: The fact that something jams Spilogale and is a Recife is false if this thing does not gear pharma. fact4:... | fact1: ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{ji} fact2: (x): ¬{K}x -> ({I}x & {J}x) fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact5: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact6: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({C}x & ¬{E}x) fact7: (¬{M}{d} & {K}{d}) -> ¬{K}{c} fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {GA}x) fact9: ¬{M}{d} fact10: {... | [
"fact19 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact19 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this prothrombinase is not a Chara but it is a kind of a DMD does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [
"fact28 -> int1: The fact that this prothrombinase is not a Chara and is a DMD is not right if the one is not a Recife.; fact27 -> int2: If this bitters jams Spilogale this bitters does not gear pharma and is not a Recife.; fact26 -> int3: That that moloch is a minimalism but it is non-cellulosid does not hold if t... | 9 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that this prothrombinase does jam Spilogale and is a Recife is incorrect that whisk is not a kind of a Recife. fact2: Somebody does rap Mankato and colourises noddle if she/he does not abbreviate. fact3: The fact that something jams Spilogale and is a Recife is false if this thing does not gear phar... | fact19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This epigastricness happens. | {B} | fact1: If that vanishing and the pardonableness happens then this epigastricness happens. fact2: If that astronauticness happens that that psychoneurotic does not occurs and that carunculateness does not occurs is incorrect. fact3: That lurching happens. fact4: That psychoneurotic happens. fact5: That both that vanishi... | fact1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact2: {D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{C}) fact3: {F} fact4: {A} fact5: {A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact6: {E} -> {D} fact7: {HL} -> ({CI} & ¬{AN}) | [
"fact5 & fact4 -> int1: That vanishing happens and the unpardonableness does not occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact4 -> int1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | This epigastricness does not occurs. | ¬{B} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that vanishing and the pardonableness happens then this epigastricness happens. fact2: If that astronauticness happens that that psychoneurotic does not occurs and that carunculateness does not occurs is incorrect. fact3: That lurching happens. fact4: That psychoneurotic happens. fact5: That both th... | fact5 & fact4 -> int1: That vanishing happens and the unpardonableness does not occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that braces trounces Heming. | {A}{a} | fact1: The fact that this bludgeon does not trounce Heming but it is cerebral is wrong. fact2: That this bludgeon is not antiapartheid but it is not non-cerebral is false. fact3: Someone trounces Heming and she is cerebral if she does not think suaveness. fact4: If that this bludgeon is non-antiapartheid but it is cere... | fact1: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact2: ¬(¬{D}{b} & {B}{b}) fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact4: ¬(¬{D}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact5: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that braces trounces Heming.; fact5 & assump1 -> int1: This bludgeon is cerebral.; fact4 & fact2 -> int2: This bludgeon is not cerebral.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact5 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact4 & fact2 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that that braces trounces Heming. | {A}{a} | [
"fact6 -> int4: That braces trounces Heming and is cerebral if that braces does not think suaveness.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this bludgeon does not trounce Heming but it is cerebral is wrong. fact2: That this bludgeon is not antiapartheid but it is not non-cerebral is false. fact3: Someone trounces Heming and she is cerebral if she does not think suaveness. fact4: If that this bludgeon is non-antiapartheid but ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that braces trounces Heming.; fact5 & assump1 -> int1: This bludgeon is cerebral.; fact4 & fact2 -> int2: This bludgeon is not cerebral.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That nook screws xerophthalmia and that thing offs. | ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) | fact1: This drumstick is not non-harsh but a razz. fact2: Everybody signalises. fact3: If this drumstick is not unpowered the fact that that nook marbleizes 20 and is expendable is wrong. fact4: This succinylcholine offs. fact5: The sleepyhead marbleizes 20. fact6: That nook is a kind of a yelled. fact7: The fact that ... | fact1: ({HU}{a} & {GT}{a}) fact2: (x): {EP}x fact3: ¬{E}{a} -> ¬({C}{aa} & {D}{aa}) fact4: {B}{gb} fact5: {C}{ga} fact6: {BF}{aa} fact7: (x): ¬({C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact8: (x): {A}x fact9: {J}{gd} fact10: {I}{b} -> {G}{b} fact11: (x): {HH}x fact12: ¬{AB}{ac} fact13: {I}{b} fact14: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact15:... | [
"fact8 -> int1: That nook screws xerophthalmia.;"
] | [
"fact8 -> int1: {A}{aa};"
] | The fact that that nook screws xerophthalmia and offs does not hold. | ¬({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) | [
"fact23 -> int2: The fact that the fact that that nook screws xerophthalmia and it offs is true is incorrect if that nook does not marbleize 20.; fact24 -> int3: If the fact that that nook marbleizes 20 and is expendable is incorrect it does not marbleizes 20.;"
] | 7 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This drumstick is not non-harsh but a razz. fact2: Everybody signalises. fact3: If this drumstick is not unpowered the fact that that nook marbleizes 20 and is expendable is wrong. fact4: This succinylcholine offs. fact5: The sleepyhead marbleizes 20. fact6: That nook is a kind of a yelled. fact7: The ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That the safari does not happens and this occupationalness does not happens does not hold. | ¬(¬{A} & ¬{C}) | fact1: This pyrography is prevented by that both that patronising protoarcheology and this filarness happens. fact2: This decreasing does not happens. fact3: That scorbuticness occurs. fact4: That that coquette does not occurs is caused by that the idiopathicness occurs and the tasting happens. fact5: That that upright... | fact1: ({HB} & {IU}) -> ¬{HP} fact2: ¬{AT} fact3: {AB} fact4: ({HI} & {JA}) -> ¬{FF} fact5: (¬{CC} & {IT}) -> ¬{HA} fact6: (¬{BI} & {GU}) -> ¬{DJ} fact7: (¬{R} & {GU}) fact8: {B} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{C}) fact9: ¬{EB} fact10: (¬{T} & {GN}) -> ¬{EA} fact11: ({DM} & {GQ}) -> ¬{CH} fact12: (¬{IB} & {DJ}) -> ¬{IE} fact13: ¬{E} -> ... | [] | [] | That the safari does not happens and this occupationalness does not happens does not hold. | ¬(¬{A} & ¬{C}) | [] | 7 | 2 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This pyrography is prevented by that both that patronising protoarcheology and this filarness happens. fact2: This decreasing does not happens. fact3: That scorbuticness occurs. fact4: That that coquette does not occurs is caused by that the idiopathicness occurs and the tasting happens. fact5: That th... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That catoptricalness occurs. | {B} | fact1: If that both that myrmecophyticness and this ontogeneticness happens is incorrect that catoptricalness does not occurs. fact2: If that voyeuristicalness does not happens then that both this urinalysis and this Charlestoning occurs does not hold. fact3: If that that mouldering teratoma does not occurs is true the... | fact1: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & {E}) fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬({BH} & {HD}) fact4: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact5: ¬({C} & {E}) -> ¬{C} | [] | [] | That catoptricalness occurs. | {B} | [] | 8 | 1 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that both that myrmecophyticness and this ontogeneticness happens is incorrect that catoptricalness does not occurs. fact2: If that voyeuristicalness does not happens then that both this urinalysis and this Charlestoning occurs does not hold. fact3: If that that mouldering teratoma does not occurs i... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That that Colombian does not happens is right. | ¬{B} | fact1: If that legislation does not occurs the fact that that epiphenomenon occurs or that Colombian does not occurs or both is incorrect. fact2: That that hamstringing pyelitis and that barraging natality occurs is false if this humaneness does not occurs. fact3: If the fact that that epiphenomenon occurs and/or that ... | fact1: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v ¬{B}) fact2: ¬{F} -> ¬({E} & {D}) fact3: ¬({A} v ¬{B}) -> ¬{GT} fact4: {I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact5: {J} -> {I} fact6: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact7: (¬{G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} fact8: ¬({E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} | [] | [] | That diffusing Hannukah does not happens. | ¬{GT} | [] | 12 | 1 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that legislation does not occurs the fact that that epiphenomenon occurs or that Colombian does not occurs or both is incorrect. fact2: That that hamstringing pyelitis and that barraging natality occurs is false if this humaneness does not occurs. fact3: If the fact that that epiphenomenon occurs an... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This pretender is unscheduled but that one is not cantonal. | ({C}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) | fact1: Either the whiteout does apply or it is exegetic or both if the mola does not gybe. fact2: Either that spliff is Linnaean or it is a Boraginaceae or both. fact3: If some man fakes Pythias but it is not impermanent it is a Stictopelia. fact4: If this pocket is a kind of a alinement this hydroxyl is superlunary. f... | fact1: ¬{K}{e} -> ({I}{d} v {J}{d}) fact2: ({S}{f} v {R}{f}) fact3: (x): ({P}x & ¬{O}x) -> {N}x fact4: {G}{b} -> {F}{a} fact5: {R}{f} -> {Q}{f} fact6: {Q}{f} -> ({P}{f} & ¬{O}{f}) fact7: (x): {H}x -> {G}x fact8: (x): ¬(¬{L}x & {K}x) -> ¬{K}x fact9: {M}{f} -> {M}{e} fact10: {S}{f} -> {Q}{f} fact11: {I}{d} -> {H}{b} fact... | [
"fact16 & fact19 -> int1: This pocket is cantonal.; int1 & fact13 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact16 & fact19 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & fact13 -> hypothesis;"
] | This pretender is unscheduled but that one is not cantonal. | ({C}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) | [
"fact35 -> int2: If this hydroxyl is not penal or meditates Gould or both then this hydroxyl does not respect controlled.; fact24 -> int3: This hydroxyl is not penal and/or it meditates Gould if it is superlunary.; fact26 -> int4: If this pocket is a serenity then this pocket is a alinement.; fact34 -> int5: If the... | 14 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Either the whiteout does apply or it is exegetic or both if the mola does not gybe. fact2: Either that spliff is Linnaean or it is a Boraginaceae or both. fact3: If some man fakes Pythias but it is not impermanent it is a Stictopelia. fact4: If this pocket is a kind of a alinement this hydroxyl is supe... | fact16 & fact19 -> int1: This pocket is cantonal.; int1 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That Passamaquody skulks and is not semitropic. | ({C}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) | fact1: That Passamaquody skulks if this oarswoman skulks. fact2: That this oarswoman is both a Voltaire and not correct is true. fact3: That Passamaquody skulks but it is not an oceanic. fact4: If the fact that someone outlines populace but it is not mercurous does not hold it does not denitrify Byelorussia. fact5: Som... | fact1: {C}{a} -> {C}{b} fact2: ({HG}{a} & ¬{FG}{a}) fact3: ({C}{b} & ¬{Q}{b}) fact4: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{H}x fact5: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact6: {A}{a} fact7: ({E}{df} & ¬{FC}{df}) fact8: {C}{b} fact9: {C}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) fact10: {E}{a} fact11: (x): {HP}x -> {E}x fact12: {A}{b} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact13: ... | [
"fact14 & fact6 -> int1: This oarswoman is a patency.; fact5 -> int2: That if this oarswoman is a patency this oarswoman skulks hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This oarswoman does skulk.; int3 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 & fact6 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact5 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{a}; int3 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | If the jeerer is a suited this thing is semitropic. | {HP}{cb} -> {E}{cb} | [
"fact19 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: That Passamaquody skulks if this oarswoman skulks. fact2: That this oarswoman is both a Voltaire and not correct is true. fact3: That Passamaquody skulks but it is not an oceanic. fact4: If the fact that someone outlines populace but it is not mercurous does not hold it does not denitrify Byelorussia. ... | fact14 & fact6 -> int1: This oarswoman is a patency.; fact5 -> int2: That if this oarswoman is a patency this oarswoman skulks hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This oarswoman does skulk.; int3 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that this exclusive happens is correct. | {C} | fact1: That the non-indivisibleness and that Caliphate occurs is not correct. fact2: This ruined does not happens if that this predating neurophysiology does not occurs but this ruined occurs is incorrect. fact3: The fact that that either this Natal occurs or this strut happens or both is not wrong is brought about by ... | fact1: ¬(¬{E} & {A}) fact2: ¬(¬{R} & {P}) -> ¬{P} fact3: ¬{M} -> ({K} v {L}) fact4: {J} -> (¬{I} & {H}) fact5: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{CF} & ¬{AD}) fact6: ¬{Q} -> ¬(¬{R} & {P}) fact7: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact8: (¬{I} & {H}) -> ¬{G} fact9: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact10: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact11: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{A}) fact12: ¬{P} -> ¬(¬{O}... | [
"fact19 & fact7 -> int1: That misdeed happens.; fact11 & fact20 -> int2: That that Caliphate occurs is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That Caliphate happens and that misdeed happens.; int3 & fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact19 & fact7 -> int1: {B}; fact11 & fact20 -> int2: {A}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({A} & {B}); int3 & fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this exclusive happens is correct. | {C} | [] | 15 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That the non-indivisibleness and that Caliphate occurs is not correct. fact2: This ruined does not happens if that this predating neurophysiology does not occurs but this ruined occurs is incorrect. fact3: The fact that that either this Natal occurs or this strut happens or both is not wrong is brought... | fact19 & fact7 -> int1: That misdeed happens.; fact11 & fact20 -> int2: That that Caliphate occurs is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That Caliphate happens and that misdeed happens.; int3 & fact18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That every man undernourisheds Latinae is incorrect. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: Everything does not cook and it is a land. fact2: Everything undernourisheds Latinae. fact3: Every person powers. | fact1: (x): (¬{C}x & {D}x) fact2: (x): {A}x fact3: (x): {ED}x | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | Every man conventionalises episteme. | (x): {HC}x | [
"fact4 -> int1: Genevieve does not cook but this person is a kind of a land.; int1 -> int2: Genevieve does not cook.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Everything does not cook and it is a land. fact2: Everything undernourisheds Latinae. fact3: Every person powers. ; $hypothesis$ = That every man undernourisheds Latinae is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that janissary impedes Pellaea. | {A}{a} | fact1: That janissary is not a pan. fact2: If that janissary impedes Pellaea then that that janissary does not sweat restfulness and is not a prying is wrong. fact3: That janissary is not a yin and it is not a prying if it is not commodious. fact4: That smoothhound is not a Occitan if that smoothhound is not uncensored... | fact1: ¬{B}{a} fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact3: ¬{FA}{a} -> (¬{JH}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ¬{DT}{gm} -> ¬{FR}{gm} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that janissary impedes Pellaea.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That that janissary does not sweat restfulness and is not a prying does not hold.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a});"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: That janissary is not a pan. fact2: If that janissary impedes Pellaea then that that janissary does not sweat restfulness and is not a prying is wrong. fact3: That janissary is not a yin and it is not a prying if it is not commodious. fact4: That smoothhound is not a Occitan if that smoothhound is not ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that this hackles is not a secondo or it is a tick or both does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) | fact1: This hackles freezes Vaccaria. fact2: That reefer is not a secondo. fact3: This symphonist is a Polyborus. fact4: That that this hackles is not a breathlessness and/or it is a proprioception is right does not hold. fact5: This symphonist is not a tick if that this hackles is a Polyborus and/or that thing signs i... | fact1: {JI}{a} fact2: ¬{AA}{ge} fact3: {A}{b} fact4: ¬(¬{CL}{a} v {EQ}{a}) fact5: ¬({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{b} fact6: {AA}{b} fact7: ¬(¬{CJ}{al} v {AJ}{al}) fact8: ¬(¬{AA}{am} v {BT}{am}) fact9: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact10: ¬(¬{A}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact11: ¬(¬{EE}{b} v {FP}{b}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this hackles is not a secondo or it is a tick or both does not hold.; fact9 & assump1 -> int1: This symphonist does not sign indecision.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}); fact9 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}{b};"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: This hackles freezes Vaccaria. fact2: That reefer is not a secondo. fact3: This symphonist is a Polyborus. fact4: That that this hackles is not a breathlessness and/or it is a proprioception is right does not hold. fact5: This symphonist is not a tick if that this hackles is a Polyborus and/or that thi... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That neurologicalness does not happens. | ¬{A} | fact1: That landscaping does not occurs if the fact that that neurologicalness occurs and this clowning spiraling does not happens does not hold. fact2: If that Revelation does not happens that neurologicalness and this clowning spiraling occurs. fact3: If that expositing baffling does not happens both this clowning sp... | fact1: ¬({A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{EL} fact2: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact3: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C}) fact4: ¬{GP} fact5: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact6: {I} -> ¬(¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact7: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact8: ¬{K} -> ({I} & {J}) fact9: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & ¬{B}) fact10: ¬{AT} fact11: ¬{A} fact12: ¬(¬{G} & ¬{H}) -> {F} fact13: ¬{BK} fact14: ¬(... | [
"fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | That landscaping does not happens. | ¬{EL} | [] | 7 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That landscaping does not occurs if the fact that that neurologicalness occurs and this clowning spiraling does not happens does not hold. fact2: If that Revelation does not happens that neurologicalness and this clowning spiraling occurs. fact3: If that expositing baffling does not happens both this c... | fact11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That this bot is not bibliothecal but that thing is a simmer is wrong. | ¬(¬{B}{c} & {C}{c}) | fact1: The cittern is not undiversified. fact2: If a cutting one is a kind of a tumidity it is not adenoidal. fact3: If the cittern is non-aeriferous and is fundamentalist this bot is not non-aeriferous. fact4: Some person is not bibliothecal if the fact that it is both not bibliothecal and a simmer does not hold. fact... | fact1: ¬{A}{a} fact2: (x): ({F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}x fact3: (¬{K}{a} & {M}{a}) -> ¬{K}{c} fact4: (x): ¬({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) fact6: (¬{K}{a} & {M}{a}) fact7: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) fact8: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} fact9: ¬{B}{c} fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact11: (x): ¬{K}x -> ({H}x & {J... | [
"fact10 & fact1 -> int1: That supertwister is non-bibliothecal.; int1 & fact15 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact10 & fact1 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & fact15 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this bot is not bibliothecal but that thing is a simmer is wrong. | ¬(¬{B}{c} & {C}{c}) | [
"fact23 -> int2: If this bot is undiversified then that this bot is not bibliothecal but that one is a simmer is incorrect.; fact16 -> int3: This bot is undiversified person that is a kind of a representative if this bot is not adenoidal.; fact22 -> int4: This bot is not adenoidal if this bot is cutting a tumidity.... | 9 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The cittern is not undiversified. fact2: If a cutting one is a kind of a tumidity it is not adenoidal. fact3: If the cittern is non-aeriferous and is fundamentalist this bot is not non-aeriferous. fact4: Some person is not bibliothecal if the fact that it is both not bibliothecal and a simmer does not ... | fact10 & fact1 -> int1: That supertwister is non-bibliothecal.; int1 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This capitalization happens. | {A} | fact1: If that brachiopodness does not occurs then the occulting happens and this capitalization happens. fact2: The ablism happens. fact3: This idling occurs. fact4: If that nimbus occurs the fact that that warbling traitorousness does not occurs but that shadowing ideality occurs is incorrect. fact5: That territorial... | fact1: ¬{B} -> ({AO} & {A}) fact2: {BE} fact3: {JI} fact4: {E} -> ¬(¬{C} & {D}) fact5: {IL} fact6: (¬{A} v {C}) -> ¬{A} fact7: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact8: {AO} fact9: {A} fact10: ¬(¬{C} & {D}) -> ¬{B} | [
"fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | This capitalization does not happens. | ¬{A} | [] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that brachiopodness does not occurs then the occulting happens and this capitalization happens. fact2: The ablism happens. fact3: This idling occurs. fact4: If that nimbus occurs the fact that that warbling traitorousness does not occurs but that shadowing ideality occurs is incorrect. fact5: That t... | fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That popery does not occurs. | ¬{B} | fact1: That schtik does not occurs. fact2: That this feeling southward does not happens and that impairing does not occurs brings about that popery. fact3: If the fact that that sharing does not occurs is right that popery does not occurs and that landing does not happens. fact4: If that pitching does not happens then ... | fact1: ¬{IO} fact2: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact3: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact4: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} v ¬{D}) fact5: (¬{EH} & ¬{JH}) -> {FU} fact6: {IC} -> ¬{BQ} fact7: {AU} fact8: ¬({H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} fact9: (¬{E} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact10: {A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact11: {FH} | [] | [] | That popery does not occurs. | ¬{B} | [] | 9 | 2 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That schtik does not occurs. fact2: That this feeling southward does not happens and that impairing does not occurs brings about that popery. fact3: If the fact that that sharing does not occurs is right that popery does not occurs and that landing does not happens. fact4: If that pitching does not hap... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That formula does not happens. | ¬{B} | fact1: If the judgment does not occurs the confederation occurs. fact2: The fact that that writing does not happens hold. fact3: The fact that the outflow but notthe stubbornness occurs is false. fact4: That misplay happens. fact5: That formula happens if that that bawling introspectiveness occurs and that esotericness... | fact1: ¬{FL} -> {DE} fact2: ¬{A} fact3: ¬({JJ} & ¬{AN}) fact4: {BH} fact5: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact6: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) | [
"fact6 & fact2 -> int1: That that bawling introspectiveness but notthat esotericness happens is false.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact2 -> int1: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If the judgment does not occurs the confederation occurs. fact2: The fact that that writing does not happens hold. fact3: The fact that the outflow but notthe stubbornness occurs is false. fact4: That misplay happens. fact5: That formula happens if that that bawling introspectiveness occurs and that es... | fact6 & fact2 -> int1: That that bawling introspectiveness but notthat esotericness happens is false.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This grits does not unclothis SBA. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: This grits intones Parji. fact2: If that something does not stargaze Bulawayo but that thing is a skepful is wrong that thing unclothes SBA. fact3: Something is incommensurate if this thing is a thudding. fact4: The fact that this cassie intones Parji and rarefies is not correct. fact5: The fact that this cassie... | fact1: {A}{b} fact2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact3: (x): {HO}x -> {M}x fact4: ¬({A}{a} & {FL}{a}) fact5: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x fact7: (x): {FK}x -> {IK}x fact8: ¬{AC}{aa} fact9: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{dj} fact10: ¬{A}{a} fact11: (¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact12: ¬{AB}{b} -> {B}{... | [
"fact14 & fact10 -> int1: The fact that this grits does not stargaze Bulawayo but the one is a skepful is wrong.; fact2 -> int2: If that this grits does not stargaze Bulawayo but it is a kind of a skepful does not hold it unclothes SBA.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 & fact10 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); fact2 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This grits does not unclothis SBA. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"fact15 -> int3: If this grits is a decennium then it does not unclothis SBA and does not intone Parji.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This grits intones Parji. fact2: If that something does not stargaze Bulawayo but that thing is a skepful is wrong that thing unclothes SBA. fact3: Something is incommensurate if this thing is a thudding. fact4: The fact that this cassie intones Parji and rarefies is not correct. fact5: The fact that t... | fact14 & fact10 -> int1: The fact that this grits does not stargaze Bulawayo but the one is a skepful is wrong.; fact2 -> int2: If that this grits does not stargaze Bulawayo but it is a kind of a skepful does not hold it unclothes SBA.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Shelby is not entomological and that thing is not sigmoid. | (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | fact1: Shelby is not entomological and it is not sigmoid if that bellhop is impious. fact2: That bellhop is impious. | fact1: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact2: {A}{a} | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: Shelby is not entomological and it is not sigmoid if that bellhop is impious. fact2: That bellhop is impious. ; $hypothesis$ = Shelby is not entomological and that thing is not sigmoid. ; $proof$ = | fact1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that drydock does not Hunt Ramayana is not correct. | {C}{a} | fact1: Some man is a kind of eutrophic man that does Hunt Ramayana if that person is not a tracked. fact2: Something Garlands lease if the fact that it is a immurement and does not assemble does not hold. fact3: That that drydock is a kind of a immurement and assembles is false. fact4: If something does not syllogize E... | fact1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {C}x) fact2: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact3: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact5: {B}{a} -> {C}{a} fact6: ¬{F}{an} fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact8: {AB}{a} -> {B}{a} fact9: ¬{A}{a} fact10: (x): {A}x -> ¬{B}x | [
"fact7 & fact9 -> int1: The fact that that drydock is a kind of a immurement that does not assemble does not hold.; fact2 -> int2: If the fact that that drydock is a immurement that does not assemble is false that drydock Garlands lease.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That drydock Garlands lease.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis... | [
"fact7 & fact9 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); fact2 -> int2: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{a}; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | This flurry does not Garland lease. | ¬{B}{an} | [
"fact11 -> int4: This flurry does not Garland lease if it is eutrophic.; fact13 -> int5: If this flurry is not a tracked then this flurry is eutrophic and it Hunts Ramayana.; fact12 -> int6: This flurry is not a tracked if this flurry does not syllogize E.S.P. and he/she is not impressionable.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some man is a kind of eutrophic man that does Hunt Ramayana if that person is not a tracked. fact2: Something Garlands lease if the fact that it is a immurement and does not assemble does not hold. fact3: That that drydock is a kind of a immurement and assembles is false. fact4: If something does not s... | fact7 & fact9 -> int1: The fact that that drydock is a kind of a immurement that does not assemble does not hold.; fact2 -> int2: If the fact that that drydock is a immurement that does not assemble is false that drydock Garlands lease.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That drydock Garlands lease.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __P... |
0.3 | That streetlight does not unionize Pipturus. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: If that councilwoman is a kind of a myology the fact that it unionizes Pipturus is true. fact2: If something is not non-Unitarian then this is a Bassia. fact3: If this balloonist is a Bassia then this one does not throttle constatation and does segregate lipogram. fact4: Someone unionizes Pipturus if it is a myo... | fact1: {B}{b} -> {A}{b} fact2: (x): {I}x -> {G}x fact3: {G}{c} -> (¬{C}{c} & {E}{c}) fact4: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact5: (¬{K}{c} v ¬{L}{c}) fact6: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact7: (x): (¬{F}x & {D}x) -> {B}x fact8: (¬{K}{c} v ¬{L}{c}) -> {I}{c} fact9: (x): (¬{C}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}{b} fact10: (¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact11:... | [
"fact11 & fact6 -> int1: That streetlight is a kind of a myology.; fact4 -> int2: That streetlight unionizes Pipturus if that streetlight is a kind of a myology.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact11 & fact6 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact4 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That streetlight does not unionize Pipturus. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact14 -> int3: If this balloonist is Unitarian it is a kind of a Bassia.; fact19 & fact12 -> int4: This balloonist is Unitarian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: This balloonist is a kind of a Bassia.; fact18 & int5 -> int6: This balloonist does not throttle constatation and segregates lipogram.; int6 -> int7: There exists ... | 7 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that councilwoman is a kind of a myology the fact that it unionizes Pipturus is true. fact2: If something is not non-Unitarian then this is a Bassia. fact3: If this balloonist is a Bassia then this one does not throttle constatation and does segregate lipogram. fact4: Someone unionizes Pipturus if i... | fact11 & fact6 -> int1: That streetlight is a kind of a myology.; fact4 -> int2: That streetlight unionizes Pipturus if that streetlight is a kind of a myology.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | There exists somebody such that if it is Sadducean it is a kind of a nickname and it is not indeterminate. | (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | fact1: There exists some person such that if it is a Thysanura it is a kind of a unsanctification and it does not constringe. fact2: There is something such that if that is inefficacious that is a broiled and that is not a pula. fact3: If this linebacker italicises airmanship this linebacker is an undress and is not ca... | fact1: (Ex): {DC}x -> ({JB}x & ¬{BC}x) fact2: (Ex): {BS}x -> ({BT}x & ¬{JI}x) fact3: {P}{aa} -> ({S}{aa} & ¬{GE}{aa}) fact4: (Ex): {EL}x -> {AM}x fact5: (Ex): {EJ}x -> ({HM}x & ¬{GC}x) fact6: (Ex): {ER}x -> ¬{HS}x fact7: (x): {EB}x -> ({IR}x & ¬{CT}x) fact8: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact9: (Ex): {GQ}x -> {CR}x... | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | That there is some man such that if it is a paucity then it desulfurizes cephalalgia and does not purify hold. | (Ex): {EB}x -> ({IR}x & ¬{CT}x) | [
"fact18 -> int1: If the sannyasi is a paucity then that desulfurizes cephalalgia and does not purify.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: There exists some person such that if it is a Thysanura it is a kind of a unsanctification and it does not constringe. fact2: There is something such that if that is inefficacious that is a broiled and that is not a pula. fact3: If this linebacker italicises airmanship this linebacker is an undress and... | fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This folacin does not depict consoling. | ¬{D}{b} | fact1: This grasshopper is not a EEG. fact2: This ethane is craniometrical. fact3: If this grasshopper is not a EEG this grasshopper drains Scaphopoda and this one frocks IDF. fact4: This ethane is a Swedish. fact5: If the fact that some man frocks IDF and it depicts consoling is incorrect then it does not depicts cons... | fact1: ¬{I}{c} fact2: {FQ}{a} fact3: ¬{I}{c} -> ({H}{c} & {G}{c}) fact4: {K}{a} fact5: (x): ¬({G}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> {D}x fact7: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {A}x) -> {E}x fact8: {A}{b} fact9: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {D}x fact10: {K}{a} -> {J}{fr} fact11: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({C}x & {B}x) fact12: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ... | [
"fact16 & fact17 -> int1: This ethane is medullary.; fact13 -> int2: This ethane is a Olimbos.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This ethane is medullary and it is a Olimbos.;"
] | [
"fact16 & fact17 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact13 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{a} & {C}{a});"
] | The fact that this deposition is a kind of a Parmeliaceae hold. | {E}{fr} | [
"fact25 -> int4: If the fact that this deposition is not a Parmeliaceae and inspissates does not hold this deposition is a Parmeliaceae.; fact24 -> int5: The fact that this deposition is not a Parmeliaceae and inspissates does not hold if it is medullary.; fact23 -> int6: If this deposition does not depict consolin... | 9 | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: This grasshopper is not a EEG. fact2: This ethane is craniometrical. fact3: If this grasshopper is not a EEG this grasshopper drains Scaphopoda and this one frocks IDF. fact4: This ethane is a Swedish. fact5: If the fact that some man frocks IDF and it depicts consoling is incorrect then it does not de... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This applique does motor and does not starve. | ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: This applique does motor and does not starve. | fact1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: This applique does motor and does not starve. ; $hypothesis$ = This applique does motor and does not starve. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This centering happens. | {B} | fact1: This commuting occurs and that feud happens. fact2: If this bezique does not happens then that biting Acheta and this astrogating blatancy happens. fact3: The loaning happens. fact4: That investment and this institution happens if this centering does not occurs. fact5: This lienalness is prevented by either that... | fact1: ({AP} & {HO}) fact2: ¬{K} -> ({J} & {I}) fact3: {FF} fact4: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {IE}) fact5: (¬{E} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{D} fact6: {M} fact7: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact8: {I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact9: ¬{G} -> ¬{F} fact10: (¬{D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{A} fact11: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & ¬{C}) fact12: {FL} fact13: {GC} fact14: ({EQ} & {FF}) fact15:... | [
"fact16 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact16 -> hypothesis;"
] | This institution occurs. | {IE} | [] | 8 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This commuting occurs and that feud happens. fact2: If this bezique does not happens then that biting Acheta and this astrogating blatancy happens. fact3: The loaning happens. fact4: That investment and this institution happens if this centering does not occurs. fact5: This lienalness is prevented by e... | fact16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This hydrocolloid is a sphericity. | {B}{a} | fact1: That goalmouth is not a Eisenhower if the fact that this pusher is a kind of non-distant thing that is not sepaline does not hold. fact2: This automatism does not gestate fidelity. fact3: This hagiologist is not a sphericity. fact4: If the fact that this planaria is not finer hold then this pusher is not a kind ... | fact1: ¬(¬{F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact2: ¬{A}{hf} fact3: ¬{B}{ak} fact4: ¬{I}{d} -> ¬{H}{c} fact5: ¬{GS}{a} fact6: ¬{B}{eh} fact7: ¬{FP}{a} fact8: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{I}x fact9: ¬{CM}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact10: ¬{AA}{aa} fact11: (x): ¬{J}x fact12: ¬{E}{b} -> ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) fact13: ¬{A}{gq} fact14: ¬{A}{a} fact... | [
"fact17 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact17 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that Meghan does not gestate fidelity hold. | ¬{A}{bc} | [
"fact20 -> int1: That this planaria is not finer if that this planaria is finer but it does not sprout Anabrus is false is correct.; fact18 -> int2: If this rhizomorph is not a Loki then that that is not non-finer and that does not sprout Anabrus does not hold.; fact21 -> int3: This rhizomorph is not a Loki.; int2 ... | 12 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That goalmouth is not a Eisenhower if the fact that this pusher is a kind of non-distant thing that is not sepaline does not hold. fact2: This automatism does not gestate fidelity. fact3: This hagiologist is not a sphericity. fact4: If the fact that this planaria is not finer hold then this pusher is n... | fact17 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that there is something such that if the thing economizes incautiousness the thing is not a dichromasy and/or the thing is not a claustrophobia is false. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x)) | fact1: There is some person such that if it economizes incautiousness then either it is a dichromasy or it is not a kind of a claustrophobia or both. fact2: This neuroscientist is not a dichromasy and/or it is not a claustrophobia if it does economize incautiousness. | fact1: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) fact2: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: There is some person such that if it economizes incautiousness then either it is a dichromasy or it is not a kind of a claustrophobia or both. fact2: This neuroscientist is not a dichromasy and/or it is not a claustrophobia if it does economize incautiousness. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that there is so... | fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That this agitating plowed happens and that aggressiveness happens is false. | ¬({C} & {B}) | fact1: That that non-unhelpfulness and that non-colorectalness happens is wrong if the eponymicness does not happens. fact2: The fact that that demolishing but notthat woodworking happens does not hold. fact3: The eponymicness does not occurs if that aggressiveness does not happens. fact4: The eponymicness occurs and t... | fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{HQ} & ¬{CS}) fact2: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact3: ¬{B} -> ¬{A} fact4: ({A} & {B}) fact5: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact6: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact7: {BH} | [
"fact4 -> int1: That aggressiveness happens.;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: {B};"
] | The fact that both that non-unhelpfulness and that non-colorectalness occurs is false. | ¬(¬{HQ} & ¬{CS}) | [] | 7 | 2 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that non-unhelpfulness and that non-colorectalness happens is wrong if the eponymicness does not happens. fact2: The fact that that demolishing but notthat woodworking happens does not hold. fact3: The eponymicness does not occurs if that aggressiveness does not happens. fact4: The eponymicness oc... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The collaborationist is aeromedical. | {C}{b} | fact1: That if that that soul likens hold then that soul is a kind of a Desmodontidae is correct. fact2: That soul does liken if the collaborationist is a kind of a Desmodontidae. fact3: The collaborationist is aeromedical if that soul is a kind of a Desmodontidae. | fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact2: {B}{b} -> {A}{a} fact3: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: That if that that soul likens hold then that soul is a kind of a Desmodontidae is correct. fact2: That soul does liken if the collaborationist is a kind of a Desmodontidae. fact3: The collaborationist is aeromedical if that soul is a kind of a Desmodontidae. ; $hypothesis$ = The collaborationist is aer... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That this clanking Galbulidae occurs results in that that specific does not occurs but this clanking Galbulidae happens. | {A} -> (¬{B} & {A}) | fact1: If the fact that this clanking Galbulidae occurs hold that specific and this clanking Galbulidae happens. fact2: That that beholding Carum does not happens prevents the Judaicness. fact3: That specific does not happens if that the pogrom happens and this mass occurs does not hold. fact4: That this mass does not ... | fact1: {A} -> ({B} & {A}) fact2: ¬{CL} -> ¬{EU} fact3: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬{EM} fact6: ¬({DO} & {AN}) fact7: ¬{DF} -> ¬{DO} fact8: {HL} fact9: (¬{FU} & {FI}) | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this clanking Galbulidae occurs hold that specific and this clanking Galbulidae happens. fact2: That that beholding Carum does not happens prevents the Judaicness. fact3: That specific does not happens if that the pogrom happens and this mass occurs does not hold. fact4: That this mass... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This equivocator does saponified. | {A}{a} | fact1: The fact that that bloodstone is not synclinal if that Belgian is not synclinal and is a Hayastan is not wrong. fact2: This equivocator saponifieds and is multicultural. fact3: Some person does saponified and it is multicultural if it is not sericultural. fact4: The fact that this equivocator is both sericultura... | fact1: (¬{D}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact4: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a}) fact5: {A}{ii} fact6: {FG}{a} fact7: {A}{dm} fact8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({E}x & {C}x) fact9: {B}{a} fact10: (x): ¬({E}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact11: (x): ¬({C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}x | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This archives saponifieds. | {A}{dg} | [
"fact14 -> int1: This archives saponifieds and this is multicultural if this is non-sericultural.; fact12 -> int2: If that this archives is a Hayastan and it is sericultural is incorrect this archives is not sericultural.; fact13 -> int3: The fact that this archives is a Hayastan and she is sericultural is false if... | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that that bloodstone is not synclinal if that Belgian is not synclinal and is a Hayastan is not wrong. fact2: This equivocator saponifieds and is multicultural. fact3: Some person does saponified and it is multicultural if it is not sericultural. fact4: The fact that this equivocator is both s... | fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Notthis sickening but this downstreamness happens. | (¬{D} & {B}) | fact1: This flirtation triggers that this lightering dislike does not happens and this sickening does not happens. fact2: That this underpaying threepence occurs and this quarterbacking does not occurs is wrong. fact3: That this underpaying threepence does not occurs yields that both that orchiopexy and that interpolat... | fact1: {I} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact2: ¬({N} & ¬{Q}) fact3: ¬{N} -> ({G} & {H}) fact4: {A} fact5: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{A}) fact6: ¬{F} -> ({EN} & {C}) fact7: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{D} & {B}) fact8: (¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact9: {G} -> ¬{F} fact10: ¬({N} & ¬{Q}) -> ¬{N} fact11: {B} -> (¬{D} & {B}) fact12: ¬{K} -> ({I} & {J}) fact13: {HJ} ... | [] | [] | Both that infection and this uricness occurs. | ({EN} & {IE}) | [
"fact21 & fact23 -> int1: This underpaying threepence does not occurs.; fact26 & int1 -> int2: That orchiopexy happens and that interpolating occurs.; int2 -> int3: That orchiopexy occurs.; fact25 & int3 -> int4: This saunter does not happens.; fact24 & int4 -> int5: That infection and that galling happens.; int5 -... | 10 | 2 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This flirtation triggers that this lightering dislike does not happens and this sickening does not happens. fact2: That this underpaying threepence occurs and this quarterbacking does not occurs is wrong. fact3: That this underpaying threepence does not occurs yields that both that orchiopexy and that ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that everybody is not a meow or does not depopulate or both is wrong. | ¬((x): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x)) | fact1: If something that is a causality is a Fish then it is not a kind of a Cuculidae. fact2: Everything is not intimal or it is not a ping or both. fact3: Everybody does not preach FPS and/or that person is not a bragging. fact4: Everyone is not a meow and/or this one does not depopulate. fact5: Everything is a kind ... | fact1: (x): ({E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact2: (x): (¬{FP}x v ¬{AU}x) fact3: (x): (¬{DH}x v ¬{GN}x) fact4: (x): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) fact5: (x): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) fact6: (x): {A}x -> (¬{FT}x v ¬{DH}x) fact7: (x): ({E}x & {F}x) fact8: (x): (¬{DM}x v ¬{J}x) fact9: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact10: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v {C}x) | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | Either everyone is not a kind of a ASCII or she does not preach FPS or both. | (x): (¬{FT}x v ¬{DH}x) | [
"fact11 -> int1: This ringhals is not a kind of a ASCII or it does not preach FPS or both if it nets cheque.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If something that is a causality is a Fish then it is not a kind of a Cuculidae. fact2: Everything is not intimal or it is not a ping or both. fact3: Everybody does not preach FPS and/or that person is not a bragging. fact4: Everyone is not a meow and/or this one does not depopulate. fact5: Everything ... | fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This observance occurs. | {A} | fact1: This observance occurs. fact2: If that anaemicness does not occurs the fact that that inexpedientness does not happens is correct. fact3: This consuetude does not occurs if that this interlacing does not occurs and that frisking does not occurs is false. fact4: The fact that this interlacing does not happens and... | fact1: {A} fact2: ¬{H} -> ¬{G} fact3: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} fact4: ¬{G} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{F}) fact5: {GH} fact6: ¬{D} -> (¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact7: ¬(¬{C} & {A}) -> ¬{A} fact8: {J} fact9: ¬{B} -> ({IH} & {A}) fact10: {IP} fact11: {HK} fact12: {T} fact13: {BO} fact14: {BM} fact15: ({L} v {K}) -> ¬{J} fact16: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}... | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | That thermography happens. | {IH} | [] | 12 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This observance occurs. fact2: If that anaemicness does not occurs the fact that that inexpedientness does not happens is correct. fact3: This consuetude does not occurs if that this interlacing does not occurs and that frisking does not occurs is false. fact4: The fact that this interlacing does not h... | fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That this unpreventableness happens and/or that stirring juiciness occurs is incorrect. | ¬({B} v {A}) | fact1: That debridement does not occurs. fact2: That debridement does not occurs and that sphacelating does not happens. fact3: That this unpreventableness and/or that stirring juiciness occurs is not right if this binucleatedness does not occurs. fact4: That that debridement does not happens and that sphacelating does... | fact1: ¬{AA} fact2: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} v {A}) fact4: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact5: (¬{M} & ¬{DH}) | [
"fact4 & fact2 -> int1: This unpreventableness happens.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact2 -> int1: {B}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this unpreventableness happens and/or that stirring juiciness occurs is incorrect. | ¬({B} v {A}) | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That debridement does not occurs. fact2: That debridement does not occurs and that sphacelating does not happens. fact3: That this unpreventableness and/or that stirring juiciness occurs is not right if this binucleatedness does not occurs. fact4: That that debridement does not happens and that sphacel... | fact4 & fact2 -> int1: This unpreventableness happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that insinuation happens and that Siamese happens is not correct. | ¬({A} & {C}) | fact1: If that notthis dormancy but that scarring Dempsey happens is false then that this Nauruanness does not happens hold. fact2: This dysplasticness does not happens if that that insinuation does not happens is right. fact3: That both that insinuation and that Siamese occurs does not hold if this pyroelectricalness ... | fact1: ¬(¬{J} & {K}) -> ¬{I} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬{DG} fact3: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) fact4: {L} -> ¬(¬{J} & {K}) fact5: {M} -> {L} fact6: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact7: (¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) fact8: (¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact9: {F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact10: ¬{D} -> {C} fact11: {G} -> {F} | [
"fact8 & fact7 -> int1: That this pyroelectricalness does not happens hold.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 & fact7 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This dysplasticness does not happens. | ¬{DG} | [] | 13 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that notthis dormancy but that scarring Dempsey happens is false then that this Nauruanness does not happens hold. fact2: This dysplasticness does not happens if that that insinuation does not happens is right. fact3: That both that insinuation and that Siamese occurs does not hold if this pyroelect... | fact8 & fact7 -> int1: That this pyroelectricalness does not happens hold.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This unsealing rickets happens. | {B} | fact1: If this spurring vocalization does not happens then the fact that this reliving Carbondale does not happens and that friction does not occurs does not hold. fact2: That this unsealing rickets does not happens results in that that beading steradian occurs and that demythologizing retronym occurs. fact3: Both that... | fact1: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ({L} & {A}) fact3: ({A} & {B}) fact4: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ({F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact6: ¬{K} -> ({I} v {H}) fact7: {IG} fact8: {CT} fact9: {HB} fact10: {A} fact11: ¬({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This unsealing rickets does not occurs. | ¬{B} | [] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If this spurring vocalization does not happens then the fact that this reliving Carbondale does not happens and that friction does not occurs does not hold. fact2: That this unsealing rickets does not happens results in that that beading steradian occurs and that demythologizing retronym occurs. fact3:... | fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The exchanging does not happens. | ¬{B} | fact1: That unadvisableness happens and the maladaptiveness occurs if this hydraulicness does not happens. fact2: That this intimidating Manteidae and that slug occurs does not hold. fact3: The exchanging happens if that unadvisableness occurs. fact4: That this hydraulicness does not happens and the cantillation does n... | fact1: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {C}) fact2: ¬({HR} & {CG}) fact3: {A} -> {B} fact4: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact5: ¬{A} fact6: ¬{HG} fact7: ¬({J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{J} fact8: ¬{BC} fact9: ¬({T} & {DC}) fact10: ¬({HD} & {FK}) -> ¬{DN} fact11: {L} -> ¬({J} & ¬{K}) fact12: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact13: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} fact14: ¬{N} -> ({L} &... | [
"fact16 & fact5 -> int1: That that pogonip and this subjacentness happens is wrong.; int1 & fact12 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact16 & fact5 -> int1: ¬({AA} & {AB}); int1 & fact12 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this intimidating Manteidae and that slug occurs does not hold. | ¬({HR} & {CG}) | [
" -> hypothesis;"
] | 0 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: That unadvisableness happens and the maladaptiveness occurs if this hydraulicness does not happens. fact2: That this intimidating Manteidae and that slug occurs does not hold. fact3: The exchanging happens if that unadvisableness occurs. fact4: That this hydraulicness does not happens and the cantillat... | fact16 & fact5 -> int1: That that pogonip and this subjacentness happens is wrong.; int1 & fact12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That pilaw is a Hemachatus. | {D}{b} | fact1: If the fact that this visitor is a SCLK and Baroque is incorrect then that Transportation is not a SCLK. fact2: If the fact that that miser is perfected is right that pilaw is a kind of a Laminariaceae. fact3: If the fact that something is a kind of an irrational but it is not albinistic is wrong then it is not ... | fact1: ¬({F}{d} & {G}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} fact2: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact3: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{H}x fact4: {A}{a} fact5: ({E}{c} v {C}{c}) fact6: ¬{F}{c} -> ({E}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({F}x & {G}x) fact8: ¬{M}{e} -> ({L}{e} & {K}{e}) fact9: {K}{e} -> ¬({I}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) fact10: {C}{c} -> {C}{b} fact11: (x):... | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> int1: That pilaw is a kind of a Laminariaceae.; fact11 -> int2: If that pilaw is a kind of a Laminariaceae and this invokes that pilaw is not a Hemachatus.;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact11 -> int2: ({B}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{D}{b};"
] | That pilaw is a Hemachatus. | {D}{b} | [
"fact18 -> int3: That miser is not a Laminariaceae if that miser is a kind of a Chari but the one does not invoke.; fact15 -> int4: The fact that this visitor is a SCLK and this thing is Baroque is wrong if this visitor is not a misconstruction.; fact16 -> int5: That this visitor is not a kind of a misconstruction ... | 10 | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this visitor is a SCLK and Baroque is incorrect then that Transportation is not a SCLK. fact2: If the fact that that miser is perfected is right that pilaw is a kind of a Laminariaceae. fact3: If the fact that something is a kind of an irrational but it is not albinistic is wrong then ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That Singhalese happens. | {D} | fact1: That notthis hamming diameter but that splurging occurs does not hold if this raving occurs. fact2: This strapping connectivity does not occurs if notthat executing but that counselorship occurs. fact3: That that Singhalese occurs and that exhibiting filthiness happens hold if this strapping connectivity does no... | fact1: {I} -> ¬(¬{H} & {G}) fact2: (¬{E} & {C}) -> ¬{B} fact3: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact4: ¬{Q} -> ({P} & {O}) fact5: {C} fact6: ¬{T} -> (¬{S} & {R}) fact7: ¬{K} -> ({J} & {I}) fact8: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact9: {O} -> ¬{N} fact10: (¬{S} & {R}) -> ¬{Q} fact11: ¬{AA} -> ({U} & ¬{T}) fact12: ¬{N} -> ¬({L} & ¬{M}) fact13: ¬... | [] | [] | That Singhalese happens. | {D} | [] | 18 | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That notthis hamming diameter but that splurging occurs does not hold if this raving occurs. fact2: This strapping connectivity does not occurs if notthat executing but that counselorship occurs. fact3: That that Singhalese occurs and that exhibiting filthiness happens hold if this strapping connectivi... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Either this issuing Valletta does not happens or that vestalness occurs or both. | (¬{D} v {C}) | fact1: That noticeableness does not occurs if that mouth does not occurs and that predicativeness does not occurs. fact2: That vestalness does not occurs. fact3: That that jugularness happens causes that that vestalness does not happens. fact4: This androgenicness and that jugularness happens. fact5: If that noticeable... | fact1: (¬{G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact2: ¬{C} fact3: {B} -> ¬{C} fact4: ({A} & {B}) fact5: ¬{E} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) fact6: {B} -> ¬(¬{D} v {C}) fact7: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{D} | [
"fact4 -> int1: That jugularness happens.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | Either this issuing Valletta does not happens or that vestalness occurs or both. | (¬{D} v {C}) | [] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That noticeableness does not occurs if that mouth does not occurs and that predicativeness does not occurs. fact2: That vestalness does not occurs. fact3: That that jugularness happens causes that that vestalness does not happens. fact4: This androgenicness and that jugularness happens. fact5: If that ... | fact4 -> int1: That jugularness happens.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That that that eater is not shakedown but that one is ocellated is wrong is not wrong. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | fact1: That eater is catatonic and is quantal if it is not a kind of a Vesalius. fact2: If that that eater does not plight Centriscidae and it does not skin Asimov is incorrect then that eater is not a Vesalius. fact3: There is nothing that is both non-bare and not non-innocuous. fact4: That some person is neutering an... | fact1: ¬{F}{aa} -> ({E}{aa} & {D}{aa}) fact2: ¬(¬{H}{aa} & ¬{G}{aa}) -> ¬{F}{aa} fact3: (x): ¬(¬{AG}x & {GA}x) fact4: (x): {D}x -> ({C}x v ¬{B}x) fact5: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact7: ¬(¬{O}{aa} & {AR}{aa}) fact8: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact9: ¬(¬{IH}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) fact10: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬... | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | That eater is not shakedown but it is ocellated. | (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | [
"fact14 -> int1: If that eater is non-neutering that eater is not a Visconti and not shakedown.;"
] | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That eater is catatonic and is quantal if it is not a kind of a Vesalius. fact2: If that that eater does not plight Centriscidae and it does not skin Asimov is incorrect then that eater is not a Vesalius. fact3: There is nothing that is both non-bare and not non-innocuous. fact4: That some person is ne... | fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This straw is not a numeral. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: This straw does not reconnoitre and is not cationic. fact2: That adversary is not a kind of a numeral. fact3: That something is a numeral that is not cationic is wrong if this thing patters foursquare. fact4: This straw is not cationic and it is not a kind of a numeral. fact5: If that something is both a numeral... | fact1: (¬{DM}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact2: ¬{B}{bh} fact3: (x): {C}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact4: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: ¬{B}{cl} fact7: ¬{GT}{a} | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That nerveroot is not a numeral. | ¬{B}{fa} | [
"fact8 -> int1: If that the fact that that nerveroot is a numeral but it is not cationic hold does not hold then that nerveroot is not a numeral.; fact9 -> int2: If that that nerveroot does patter foursquare is correct that that nerveroot is a kind of a numeral but this one is not cationic is wrong.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This straw does not reconnoitre and is not cationic. fact2: That adversary is not a kind of a numeral. fact3: That something is a numeral that is not cationic is wrong if this thing patters foursquare. fact4: This straw is not cationic and it is not a kind of a numeral. fact5: If that something is both... | fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that this cheerlessness does not occurs is correct. | ¬{B} | fact1: This cheerlessness does not happens and this transition does not occurs if that psychoanalyticalness does not occurs. fact2: If this psychotherapeuticness does not occurs this steering occurs and this respectableness does not occurs. fact3: If that trickling does not happens notthat divulgence but this cheerless... | fact1: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact2: ¬{G} -> ({E} & ¬{F}) fact3: ¬{D} -> (¬{HU} & {B}) fact4: {F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{C}) fact5: ¬{I} -> ¬({H} & {D}) fact6: {CF} -> (¬{CA} & {BE}) fact7: ¬{C} -> ({AL} & {A}) fact8: ({J} v ¬{L}) -> {J} fact9: {CI} -> {HA} fact10: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact11: ¬({H} & {D}) -> ¬{D} fact12: {A} fa... | [] | [] | The fact that this cheerlessness does not occurs is correct. | ¬{B} | [] | 10 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This cheerlessness does not happens and this transition does not occurs if that psychoanalyticalness does not occurs. fact2: If this psychotherapeuticness does not occurs this steering occurs and this respectableness does not occurs. fact3: If that trickling does not happens notthat divulgence but this... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This stocktaker is a Katari. | {A}{a} | fact1: This stocktaker is not a kind of a Hyacinthoides if that limo compresses contemporaneousness and is a Hyacinthoides. fact2: That limo is a Hyacinthoides that is chitinous. fact3: If that limo is not a message that this stocktaker is not a kind of a Anagyris and that is not a canebrake is wrong. fact4: If somebod... | fact1: ({J}{b} & {I}{b}) -> ¬{I}{a} fact2: ({I}{b} & {K}{b}) fact3: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬(¬{F}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact4: (x): ({G}x & ¬{H}x) -> {E}x fact5: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({G}x & ¬{H}x) fact6: (x): ({G}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{E}x fact7: (x): {C}x -> {A}x fact8: {A}{be} fact9: ¬{M}{b} -> (¬{L}{b} v {J}{b}) fact10: {A}{is} fact11: (x): {D}x ->... | [
"fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | This stocktaker is not a kind of a Katari. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact21 -> int1: If the fact that this stocktaker does not disapprove but it is controversial does not hold it is not a Katari.; fact22 -> int2: The fact that this stocktaker does not disapprove and is controversial is incorrect if this stocktaker is a kind of a canebrake.; fact25 -> int3: If the fact that that tha... | 7 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This stocktaker is not a kind of a Hyacinthoides if that limo compresses contemporaneousness and is a Hyacinthoides. fact2: That limo is a Hyacinthoides that is chitinous. fact3: If that limo is not a message that this stocktaker is not a kind of a Anagyris and that is not a canebrake is wrong. fact4: ... | fact17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This folacin is not a mill. | ¬{C}{b} | fact1: That warren is both not non-Libyan and a Heimdal. fact2: If that something is not Libyan and is a kind of a Heimdal does not hold then it is not a mill. fact3: If that warren is a Heimdal this folacin is a mill. fact4: That warren is Libyan. | fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact4: {A}{a} | [
"fact1 -> int1: That warren is a Heimdal.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This folacin is not a mill. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"fact5 -> int2: This folacin is not a mill if the fact that this folacin is not Libyan but that is a Heimdal does not hold.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That warren is both not non-Libyan and a Heimdal. fact2: If that something is not Libyan and is a kind of a Heimdal does not hold then it is not a mill. fact3: If that warren is a Heimdal this folacin is a mill. fact4: That warren is Libyan. ; $hypothesis$ = This folacin is not a mill. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> int1: That warren is a Heimdal.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This susurrus occurs. | {C} | fact1: That that polyploidness does not occurs triggers that this susurrus does not happens. fact2: That mucoid occurs. fact3: If that mucoid happens then that polyploidness does not happens. fact4: Either this non-polyploidness or that that mucoid does not occurs or both is triggered by that that removableness happens... | fact1: ¬{B} -> ¬{C} fact2: {A} fact3: {A} -> ¬{B} fact4: {D} -> (¬{B} v ¬{A}) | [
"fact3 & fact2 -> int1: That polyploidness does not happens.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact2 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | This susurrus occurs. | {C} | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that polyploidness does not occurs triggers that this susurrus does not happens. fact2: That mucoid occurs. fact3: If that mucoid happens then that polyploidness does not happens. fact4: Either this non-polyploidness or that that mucoid does not occurs or both is triggered by that that removablene... | fact3 & fact2 -> int1: That polyploidness does not happens.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that scorcher does not happens and this Earman electronics does not happens is false. | ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: The fact that that scorcher happens but this Earman electronics does not happens is wrong. fact2: The fact that that quaver does not occurs and the theosophicalness does not happens does not hold. fact3: If the academicianship happens then that both this non-microbialness and this non-artificialness happens is n... | fact1: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact2: ¬(¬{AR} & ¬{P}) fact3: {HR} -> ¬(¬{CA} & ¬{CK}) fact4: ¬(¬{GU} & ¬{I}) fact5: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact6: ¬(¬{CJ} & ¬{HI}) fact7: {A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact8: ¬(¬{BN} & ¬{BT}) fact9: {IJ} -> ¬(¬{IN} & ¬{EI}) fact10: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact11: ¬(¬{ED} & ¬{CF}) fact12: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}... | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that that scorcher happens but this Earman electronics does not happens is wrong. fact2: The fact that that quaver does not occurs and the theosophicalness does not happens does not hold. fact3: If the academicianship happens then that both this non-microbialness and this non-artificialness ha... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This partridgeberry transistorizes pneumothorax. | {C}{a} | fact1: This partridgeberry is a kind of a octavo and transistorizes pneumothorax if the storey is not a Heterotheca. fact2: If this partridgeberry is not a Heterotheca the storey is a octavo. fact3: This partridgeberry is a octavo. | fact1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{aa} fact3: {B}{a} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: This partridgeberry is a kind of a octavo and transistorizes pneumothorax if the storey is not a Heterotheca. fact2: If this partridgeberry is not a Heterotheca the storey is a octavo. fact3: This partridgeberry is a octavo. ; $hypothesis$ = This partridgeberry transistorizes pneumothorax. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This sylvanite is not an ill. | ¬{C}{b} | fact1: That lancewood is an ill. fact2: If that lancewood butchers winded this sylvanite is an ill. fact3: That lancewood is a brake and this one butchers winded. | fact1: {C}{a} fact2: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact3: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"fact3 -> int1: That lancewood butchers winded.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That lancewood is an ill. fact2: If that lancewood butchers winded this sylvanite is an ill. fact3: That lancewood is a brake and this one butchers winded. ; $hypothesis$ = This sylvanite is not an ill. ; $proof$ = | fact3 -> int1: That lancewood butchers winded.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This crystallographer is not a kind of a Atlantic. | ¬{D}{c} | fact1: That that microsporangium is a Orycteropus and it is a pycnosis does not hold if the fact that that perijove is not butyraceous is true. fact2: This crystallographer is not butyraceous. fact3: The fact that that that microsporangium is both a Orycteropus and a pycnosis is wrong is true. fact4: That perijove is n... | fact1: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) fact2: ¬{B}{c} fact3: ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) fact4: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact5: (x): {I}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) fact6: ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact7: ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact8: ¬{C}{c} fact9: ({AB}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact10: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) fact11: ({AA}{a} v ¬{A... | [
"fact11 & fact15 -> int1: That perijove is not butyraceous.;"
] | [
"fact11 & fact15 -> int1: ¬{B}{a};"
] | This crystallographer is a Atlantic. | {D}{c} | [
"fact21 -> int2: This crystallographer is not butyraceous if the fact that it does not titillate sopping and it is not a kind of a pycnosis does not hold.; fact20 -> int3: This crystallographer does not broaden and that person is not a kind of a apanage if this crystallographer does practice Rushdie.;"
] | 7 | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that microsporangium is a Orycteropus and it is a pycnosis does not hold if the fact that that perijove is not butyraceous is true. fact2: This crystallographer is not butyraceous. fact3: The fact that that that microsporangium is both a Orycteropus and a pycnosis is wrong is true. fact4: That per... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That this presenter tapers if this landmark ingurgitates does not hold. | ¬({A}{a} -> {B}{b}) | fact1: If some man gelds then it tapers. fact2: If this landmark ingurgitates then that this presenter jangles agrobiology but it does not geld is false. fact3: If this landmark ingurgitates the fact that this presenter jangles agrobiology and it gelds is wrong. fact4: If the fact that somebody jangles agrobiology but ... | fact1: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact4: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this landmark does ingurgitate.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That this presenter jangles agrobiology and does not geld is false.; fact4 -> int2: This presenter tapers if the fact that that thing jangles agrobiology and that thing does not geld is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Thi... | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); fact4 -> int2: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{b}; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If some man gelds then it tapers. fact2: If this landmark ingurgitates then that this presenter jangles agrobiology but it does not geld is false. fact3: If this landmark ingurgitates the fact that this presenter jangles agrobiology and it gelds is wrong. fact4: If the fact that somebody jangles agrobi... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this landmark does ingurgitate.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That this presenter jangles agrobiology and does not geld is false.; fact4 -> int2: This presenter tapers if the fact that that thing jangles agrobiology and that thing does not geld is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This pre... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.